Wildlife responses to thinning and burning treatments in southwestern conifer forests: A meta-analysis

Keyphrases

• Wildlife 100%
• Small Diameter 100%
• Meta-analysis 100%
• Conifer Forest 100%
• Wildfire 80%
• Wildlife Species 60%
• Overstory Removal 60%
• Reproductive Output 40%
• Negative Reactivity 40%
• Selective Harvesting 40%
• Arizona 20%
• High Density 20%
• Paucity 20%
• Western United States 20%
• New Mexico 20%
• Ecological Effects 20%
• Pinus Ponderosa 20%
• Ponderosa pine 20%
• Mixed Conifer 20%
• Rodents 20%
• Euro-American 20%
• Landscape Scale 20%
• Picea 20%
• Forest Management 20%
• Response to Treatment 20%
• Bole 20%
• Fuel Load 20%
• Land Managers 20%
• Small Mammals 20%
• Before-after-control-impact Design 20%
• Abies 20%
• Large Spatial Scale 20%
• Fire Suppression 20%
• Forest Wildfire 20%
• Increased Incidence 20%
• High Diversity 20%
• Response Variable 20%
• Bird Species 20%
• Patchy 20%
• Forest Health 20%
• Foraging Birds 20%
• Clear-cutting 20%
• Heavy Fuel 20%
• Positive Responses 20%
• Neutral Response 20%
• Aerial 20%
• Minimal Impact 20%
• Pinus Forest 20%
• Long-term Response 20%
• Fuel Continuity 20%
• Passerine Birds 20%
• Control Impacts 20%
• Managed Wildfire 20%
• Shelterwood 20%
• Ground-foraging Birds 20%
• Scale Usage 20%
• Foraging Guild 20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

• Wildlife Species 100%
• Overstory 100%
• Meta-Analysis 100%
• Pinus 66%
• Reproductives 66%
• Foraging 66%
• Americans 33%
• Pinus ponderosa 33%
• Forest Management 33%
• Picea Abies 33%
• Small Mammal 33%
• Fire Suppression 33%
• Passeriformes 33%
• Forest Health 33%
• Clearcutting 33%