Why we need to investigate casual speech to truly understand language production, processing and the mental Lexicon

Benjamin V. Tucker, Mirjam Ernestus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

The majority of studies addressing psycholinguistic questions focus on speech produced and processed in a careful, laboratory speech style. This 'careful' speech is very different from the speech that listeners encounter in casual conversations. This article argues that research on casual speech is necessary to show the validity of conclusions based on careful speech. Moreover, research on casual speech produces new insights and questions on the processes underlying communication and on the mental lexicon that cannot be revealed by research using careful speech. This article first places research on casual speech in its historic perspective. It then provides many examples of how casual speech differs from careful speech and shows that these differences may have important implications for psycholinguistic theories. Subsequently, the article discusses the challenges that research on casual speech faces, which stem from the high variability of this speech style, its necessary casual context, and that casual speech is connected speech. We also present opportunities for research on casual speech, mostly in the form of new experimental methods that facilitate research on connected speech. However, real progress can only be made if these new methods are combined with advanced (still to be developed) statistical techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-400
Number of pages26
JournalMental Lexicon
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Casual speech
  • Conversational speech
  • Experimental paradigms
  • Pronunciation variability
  • Statistical analyses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why we need to investigate casual speech to truly understand language production, processing and the mental Lexicon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this