Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Northern Arizona University Home
Home
Profiles
Departments and Centers
Scholarly Works
Activities
Grants
Datasets
Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Where are the missing faults in translated terranes?
Paul J. Umhoefer
Earth and Sustainability
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
26
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Where are the missing faults in translated terranes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Strike-slip Fault
100%
Terranes
100%
Plate Boundary
30%
Baja California
30%
North America
20%
Normal Fault
20%
Gulf of California
20%
Divergent Plate Boundaries
20%
British Columbia
20%
Low Potential
20%
Oblique Rift
20%
Scale Translation
10%
Rift
10%
Transform Faults
10%
Secondary Fault
10%
Major Fault
10%
Rocky Mountains
10%
Paleomagnetism
10%
Relative Motion
10%
New Zealand
10%
Long Distance
10%
Fold-and-thrust Belt
10%
Oceanic Crust
10%
Buoyancy
10%
Thrust Fault
10%
Left behind
10%
Continental Crust
10%
Anastomosis
10%
San Andreas
10%
Large Offset
10%
Reliable Indicator
10%
Modern Plate Tectonics
10%
Marlborough Fault System
10%
Extensional Faults
10%
Transform Plate Boundary
10%
Single Fault
10%
Northern British Columbia
10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Strike-Slip Fault
100%
Terrane
100%
Plate Boundary
66%
California
44%
Lower California (Mexico)
33%
British Columbia
33%
North America
22%
Borderland
22%
Eocene
11%
Geological Fault
11%
Geology
11%
Transform Fault
11%
Paleomagnetism
11%
Oceanic Crust
11%
New Zealand
11%
Continental Crust
11%
Faulting
11%
Plate (Tectonics)
11%
Early Cretaceous
11%