TY - JOUR
T1 - What controls variation in carbon use efficiency among Amazonian tropical forests?
AU - Doughty, Christopher E.
AU - Goldsmith, Gregory R.
AU - Raab, Nicolas
AU - Girardin, Cecile A.J.
AU - Farfan-Amezquita, Filio
AU - Huaraca-Huasco, Walter
AU - Silva-Espejo, Javier E.
AU - Araujo-Murakami, Alejandro
AU - da Costa, Antonio C.L.
AU - Rocha, Wanderley
AU - Galbraith, David
AU - Meir, Patrick
AU - Metcalfe, Dan B.
AU - Malhi, Yadvinder
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the many people who contributed to this project including: Luzmila Arroyo, Juan P. Heredia, Marcio Flores, Rebeca Sibler, Luz M. Mendizabal, Erwin Pardo-Toledo, Meison Vega, Luzmarina Moreno, Victor D. Rojas-Landivar, Alexandre A.R. de Oliveira, Guilherme F.C. Neto, João de Athaydes Silva Junior, Luiz E.O.C. Aragão, Samuel Almeida, William Farfán-Rios, Karina Garćıa-Cabrera, Joshua B. Fisher, Darcy F. Galiano-Cabrera, Norma Salinas-Revilla, Lidia P. Huaraca-Quispe, Ivonne Alzamora-Taype, Luzmilla Eguiluz-Mora, Kate Halladay, Carlos A. Quesada, Amanda L. Robertson, Joana Zaragoza-Castells, Clara M. Rojas-Villagra, Yulina Pelaez-Tapia, Paulo Brando and Divino Silvério. This work is a product of the Global Ecosystems Monitoring (GEM) network (gem.tropicalforests.ox.ac.uk) the Andes Biodiversity and Ecosystems Research Group ABERG (andesresearch.org) and the Amazon Forest Inventory Network RAINFOR (www.rainfor.org) research consortia, and was funded by grants from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (Grants NE/D01025X/1, NE/D014174/1), grants to YM and OP from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and a grant from the EU FP7 GEOCARBON (283080) project. We thank the Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (SERNANP) and personnel of Manu National Park who provided logistical assistance and permission to work in the protected areas in Peru, the Explorers’ Inn at Tambopata, ACCA for use of the Wayqecha Research Station, and IIAP for use of the Allpahuayo Research Station, the Museo Goeldi for access to the CaxiuanãResearch Station, and IPAM for the access to the Tan-guro plots. We also gratefully acknowledge LBA support CNPQ grant 411 457914/2013-0/MCTI/CNPq/FNDCT/LBA/ESE-CAFLOR to ACLD, and NERC and ARC support to PM (NE/ J011002/1, DP170104091). YM is supported by an ERC Advanced Investigator Award GEM-TRAIT (321131) and by the Jackson Foundation. CED is supported by the John Fell Fund and Google.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Why do some forests produce biomass more efficiently than others? Variations in Carbon Use Efficiency (CUE: total Net Primary Production (NPP)/ Gross Primary Production (GPP)) may be due to changes in wood residence time (Biomass/NPPwood), temperature, or soil nutrient status. We tested these hypotheses in 14, one ha plots across Amazonian and Andean forests where we measured most key components of net primary production (NPP: wood, fine roots, and leaves) and autotrophic respiration (Ra; wood, rhizosphere, and leaf respiration). We found that lower fertility sites were less efficient at producing biomass and had higher rhizosphere respiration, indicating increased carbon allocation to belowground components. We then compared wood respiration to wood growth and rhizosphere respiration to fine root growth and found that forests with residence times <40 yrs had significantly lower maintenance respiration for both wood and fine roots than forests with residence times >40 yrs. A comparison of rhizosphere respiration to fine root growth showed that rhizosphere growth respiration was significantly greater at low fertility sites. Overall, we found that Amazonian forests produce biomass less efficiently in stands with residence times >40 yrs and in stands with lower fertility, but changes to long-term mean annual temperatures do not impact CUE.
AB - Why do some forests produce biomass more efficiently than others? Variations in Carbon Use Efficiency (CUE: total Net Primary Production (NPP)/ Gross Primary Production (GPP)) may be due to changes in wood residence time (Biomass/NPPwood), temperature, or soil nutrient status. We tested these hypotheses in 14, one ha plots across Amazonian and Andean forests where we measured most key components of net primary production (NPP: wood, fine roots, and leaves) and autotrophic respiration (Ra; wood, rhizosphere, and leaf respiration). We found that lower fertility sites were less efficient at producing biomass and had higher rhizosphere respiration, indicating increased carbon allocation to belowground components. We then compared wood respiration to wood growth and rhizosphere respiration to fine root growth and found that forests with residence times <40 yrs had significantly lower maintenance respiration for both wood and fine roots than forests with residence times >40 yrs. A comparison of rhizosphere respiration to fine root growth showed that rhizosphere growth respiration was significantly greater at low fertility sites. Overall, we found that Amazonian forests produce biomass less efficiently in stands with residence times >40 yrs and in stands with lower fertility, but changes to long-term mean annual temperatures do not impact CUE.
KW - Amazonia
KW - CUE
KW - GPP
KW - NPP
KW - temperature
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031090651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031090651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/btp.12504
DO - 10.1111/btp.12504
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85031090651
SN - 0006-3606
VL - 50
SP - 16
EP - 25
JO - Biotropica
JF - Biotropica
IS - 1
ER -