TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of MODIS FPAR products in boreal forests of alaska
AU - Steinberg, Daniel C.
AU - Goetz, Scott J.
AU - Hyer, Edward J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received January 3, 2005; revised April 15, 2005. This work was supported in part by by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Carbon Cycle Science Program (NA17RJ1223) and in part by the NASA ADRO program (NAG510097). D. C. Steinberg and S. J. Goetz are with The Woods Hole Research Center, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). E. J. Hyer is with the Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TGRS.2005.862266
PY - 2006/7
Y1 - 2006/7
N2 - Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by vegetation (FPAR) products covering the boreal forest of interior Alaska were analyzed and compared with field measurements of canopy light harvesting over a multiyear period (2001 to 2004), as well as to high-resolution FPAR maps derived from IKONOS and Landsat ETM+ imagery. The spatial variability of FPAR within the MODIS products was examined by incorporating the field measurements and aggregating the high-resolution FPAR maps to the MODIS scale. Characterization of the temporal accuracy of the MODIS FPAR products was conducted through comparisons with continuously operating canopy light interception measurements. The MODIS product tended to overestimate F PAR relative to both ground-based measurements and Landsat-derived estimates of FPAR, particularly in the more sparsely vegetated burn scars on which we focus related research, but adequately captured seasonal variability associated with vegetation phenology. A combination of canopy closure and ground cover vegetation was identified as the source of most of the discrepancies between the MODIS estimated and field measured FPAR values. Neither the field measurements nor the high resolution image F PAR maps based on the field measurements characterized the light environment of the ground cover vegetation (i.e., <10 cm height); thus, absolute validation of the MODIS products was incomplete - despite the extensive spatial and temporal characterization of FPAR dynamics in the study region. We discuss these results, explore some other possible sources for observed differences between the MODIS, field, and high-resolution F PAR maps, and consider possible ways to address these issues in future work.
AB - Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by vegetation (FPAR) products covering the boreal forest of interior Alaska were analyzed and compared with field measurements of canopy light harvesting over a multiyear period (2001 to 2004), as well as to high-resolution FPAR maps derived from IKONOS and Landsat ETM+ imagery. The spatial variability of FPAR within the MODIS products was examined by incorporating the field measurements and aggregating the high-resolution FPAR maps to the MODIS scale. Characterization of the temporal accuracy of the MODIS FPAR products was conducted through comparisons with continuously operating canopy light interception measurements. The MODIS product tended to overestimate F PAR relative to both ground-based measurements and Landsat-derived estimates of FPAR, particularly in the more sparsely vegetated burn scars on which we focus related research, but adequately captured seasonal variability associated with vegetation phenology. A combination of canopy closure and ground cover vegetation was identified as the source of most of the discrepancies between the MODIS estimated and field measured FPAR values. Neither the field measurements nor the high resolution image F PAR maps based on the field measurements characterized the light environment of the ground cover vegetation (i.e., <10 cm height); thus, absolute validation of the MODIS products was incomplete - despite the extensive spatial and temporal characterization of FPAR dynamics in the study region. We discuss these results, explore some other possible sources for observed differences between the MODIS, field, and high-resolution F PAR maps, and consider possible ways to address these issues in future work.
KW - Boreal
KW - Fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by vegetation (f)
KW - Moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (modis)
KW - Satellite remote sensing
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746357566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746357566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TGRS.2005.862266
DO - 10.1109/TGRS.2005.862266
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33746357566
SN - 0196-2892
VL - 44
SP - 1818
EP - 1828
JO - IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
JF - IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
IS - 7
M1 - 1645282
ER -