TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a predictive framework for biocrust mediation of plant performance
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Havrilla, Caroline A.
AU - Chaudhary, V. Bala
AU - Ferrenberg, Scott
AU - Antoninka, Anita J.
AU - Belnap, Jayne
AU - Bowker, Matthew A.
AU - Eldridge, David J.
AU - Faist, Akasha M.
AU - Huber-Sannwald, Elisabeth
AU - Leslie, Alexander D.
AU - Rodriguez-Caballero, Emilio
AU - Zhang, Yuanming
AU - Barger, Nichole N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Understanding the importance of biotic interactions in driving the distribution and abundance of species is a central goal of plant ecology. Early vascular plants likely colonized land occupied by biocrusts — photoautotrophic, surface-dwelling soil communities comprised of cyanobacteria, bryophytes, lichens and fungi — suggesting biotic interactions between biocrusts and plants have been at play for some 2,000 million years. Today, biocrusts coexist with plants in dryland ecosystems worldwide, and have been shown to both facilitate or inhibit plant species performance depending on ecological context. Yet, the factors that drive the direction and magnitude of these effects remain largely unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis of plant responses to biocrusts using a global dataset encompassing 1,004 studies from six continents. Meta-analysis revealed there is no simple positive or negative effect of biocrusts on plants. Rather, plant responses differ by biocrust composition and plant species traits and vary across plant ontogeny. Moss-dominated biocrusts facilitated, while lichen-dominated biocrusts inhibited overall plant performance. Plant responses also varied among plant functional groups: C4 grasses received greater benefits from biocrusts compared to C3 grasses, and plants without N-fixing symbionts responded more positively to biocrusts than plants with N-fixing symbionts. Biocrusts decreased germination but facilitated growth of non-native plant species. Synthesis. Results suggest that interspecific variation in plant responses to biocrusts, contingent on biocrust type, plant traits, and ontogeny can have strong impacts on plant species performance. These findings have important implications for understanding biocrust contributions to plant productivity and community assembly processes in ecosystems worldwide.
AB - Understanding the importance of biotic interactions in driving the distribution and abundance of species is a central goal of plant ecology. Early vascular plants likely colonized land occupied by biocrusts — photoautotrophic, surface-dwelling soil communities comprised of cyanobacteria, bryophytes, lichens and fungi — suggesting biotic interactions between biocrusts and plants have been at play for some 2,000 million years. Today, biocrusts coexist with plants in dryland ecosystems worldwide, and have been shown to both facilitate or inhibit plant species performance depending on ecological context. Yet, the factors that drive the direction and magnitude of these effects remain largely unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis of plant responses to biocrusts using a global dataset encompassing 1,004 studies from six continents. Meta-analysis revealed there is no simple positive or negative effect of biocrusts on plants. Rather, plant responses differ by biocrust composition and plant species traits and vary across plant ontogeny. Moss-dominated biocrusts facilitated, while lichen-dominated biocrusts inhibited overall plant performance. Plant responses also varied among plant functional groups: C4 grasses received greater benefits from biocrusts compared to C3 grasses, and plants without N-fixing symbionts responded more positively to biocrusts than plants with N-fixing symbionts. Biocrusts decreased germination but facilitated growth of non-native plant species. Synthesis. Results suggest that interspecific variation in plant responses to biocrusts, contingent on biocrust type, plant traits, and ontogeny can have strong impacts on plant species performance. These findings have important implications for understanding biocrust contributions to plant productivity and community assembly processes in ecosystems worldwide.
KW - biological soil crust
KW - biotic interactions
KW - biotic resistance; biotic soil community; germination
KW - facilitation
KW - meta-analysis
KW - plant functional traits
KW - plant–soil (below-ground) interactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073618482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073618482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2745.13269
DO - 10.1111/1365-2745.13269
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073618482
SN - 0022-0477
VL - 107
SP - 2789
EP - 2807
JO - Journal of Ecology
JF - Journal of Ecology
IS - 6
ER -