To touch or not to touch: Examining the role of choice set size

Steven Liu, Andrew M. Kaikati, Mark J. Arnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Touch is a powerful means to explore one's environment and a critical sensory modality for information gathering. Previous research has shown the positive effects of product touch on key outcomes such as perceived product ownership and choice confidence, yet only in the context of consumers examining a solitary product or a small choice set. The current research draws on the choice overload hypothesis to examine whether a large choice set size attenuates the positive effects of touch. Our findings suggest that product touch results in more positive outcomes when choice sets are small (vs. large), with perceived choice difficulty mediating this effect (Experiment 1). The interactive effect of choice set size and touch is diminished in situations where touch conveys limited additional product information (Experiment 2). Further, we find that touching a large choice set can be advantageous among certain consumers, as those with a maximizing mindset respond more favorably to a large choice set when they can touch the items versus not (Experiment 3). We discuss research implications for the literatures on product touch, choice overload, and consumer mindsets, and practical implications for marketers as pertaining to assortment management, message framing, and online retail shopping environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-578
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology and Marketing
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • assortment size
  • choice confidence
  • choice overload
  • haptic information
  • maximizing mindset
  • perceived ownership
  • product touch
  • sensory marketing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To touch or not to touch: Examining the role of choice set size'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this