TY - JOUR
T1 - The Report of My Death was an Exaggeration
T2 - A Review for Researchers Using Microsatellites in the 21st Century
AU - Hodel, Richard G.J.
AU - Segovia-Salcedo, M. Claudia
AU - Landis, Jacob B.
AU - Crowl, Andrew A.
AU - Sun, Miao
AU - Liu, Xiaoxian
AU - Gitzendanner, Matthew A.
AU - Douglas, Norman A.
AU - Germain-Aubrey, Charlotte C.
AU - Chen, Shichao
AU - Soltis, Douglas E.
AU - Soltis, Pamela S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Hodel et al.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Microsatellites, or simple sequence repeats (SSRs), have long played a major role in genetic studies due to their typically high polymorphism. They have diverse applications, including genome mapping, forensics, ascertaining parentage, population and conservation genetics, identification of the parentage of polyploids, and phylogeography. We compare SSRs and newer methods, such as genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-Seq), and offer recommendations for researchers considering which genetic markers to use. We also review the variety of techniques currently used for identifying microsatellite loci and developing primers, with a particular focus on those that make use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). Additionally, we review software for microsatellite development and report on an experiment to assess the utility of currently available software for SSR development. Finally, we discuss the future of microsatellites and make recommendations for researchers preparing to use microsatellites. We argue that microsatellites still have an important place in the genomic age as they remain effective and cost-efficient markers.
AB - Microsatellites, or simple sequence repeats (SSRs), have long played a major role in genetic studies due to their typically high polymorphism. They have diverse applications, including genome mapping, forensics, ascertaining parentage, population and conservation genetics, identification of the parentage of polyploids, and phylogeography. We compare SSRs and newer methods, such as genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-Seq), and offer recommendations for researchers considering which genetic markers to use. We also review the variety of techniques currently used for identifying microsatellite loci and developing primers, with a particular focus on those that make use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). Additionally, we review software for microsatellite development and report on an experiment to assess the utility of currently available software for SSR development. Finally, we discuss the future of microsatellites and make recommendations for researchers preparing to use microsatellites. We argue that microsatellites still have an important place in the genomic age as they remain effective and cost-efficient markers.
KW - genotyping by sequencing (GBS)
KW - microsatellite development
KW - next-generation sequencing (NGS)
KW - restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-Seq)
KW - simple sequence repeats (SSR)
KW - transcriptomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975492819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975492819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3732/apps.1600025
DO - 10.3732/apps.1600025
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84975492819
SN - 2168-0450
VL - 4
JO - Applications in Plant Sciences
JF - Applications in Plant Sciences
IS - 6
M1 - 1600025
ER -