The NPS and Ossification: Does It Still Exist?

Sara Rinfret, Jeffrey Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The US notice and comment rulemaking process has often been considered ossified or broken, but recent scholarship has questioned this claim. To address this disagreement, we use McGarity’s (1992) ossification argument as a descriptive framework to structure an examination of interview data from three National Park Service rules: (1) Yellowstone National Park Rule, (2) Areas of the National Park System, Grand Canyon National Park Rule, and (3) the Gateway National Recreation Area, Sandy Hook Unit, Personal Watercraft Use Rule. We offer qualitative insights into what drives the longevity of NPS rulemaking, including analytical, scientific review, and substantive review requirements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-149
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 28 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Environmental policy
  • NPS
  • ossification
  • rulemaking
  • stakeholders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The NPS and Ossification: Does It Still Exist?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this