The impact of multiplex genetic testing on disease risk perceptions

S. Shiloh, H. D. deHeer, S. Peleg, S. Hensley Alford, K. Skapinsky, J. S. Roberts, D. W. Hadley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


This study assessed the effects of multiplex genetic testing on disease risk perceptions among 216 healthy adults. Participants, aged 25-40, were recruited through the Multiplex Initiative, which offered a genetic susceptibility test for eight common diseases. Participants completed baseline telephone and web-based surveys prior to making the testing decision. Three months after the receipt of mailed test results, participants completed a follow-up telephone survey. Risk perceptions for the eight diseases were measured at baseline and follow-up, along with beliefs about genetic causation of those diseases. The main results were: (i) mean risk perceptions were considerably stable from baseline to follow-up; (ii) the best predictors of follow-up risk perceptions were the corresponding baseline perceptions and family history; and (iii) within-individuals, most participants increased or decreased their risk perceptions for specific diseases in concordance with the number of risk markers they carry, their family history and their beliefs about genetic causality of diseases. In conclusion, participants presented a vigilant approach to the interpretation of genetic test results, which provides reassurance with regard to a potential inflation of risk perceptions in the population because of multiplex genetic testing. Section Editor: Aad Tibben, email: [email protected]

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-123
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Genetics
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015


  • Family history
  • Genetic testing
  • Multiplex
  • Risk perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)


Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of multiplex genetic testing on disease risk perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this