TY - JOUR
T1 - The financially optimal loblolly pine planting density and management regime for nonindustrial private forestland in East Texas
AU - Huang, Ching Hsun
AU - Kronrad, Gary D.
AU - Morton, Jason D.
PY - 2005/2
Y1 - 2005/2
N2 - Economic analyses were conducted to investigate the effects of initial planting density on the profitability of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) on nonindustrial private forestland (NIPF) in East Texas. Five planting densities of 870, 725, 620, 540, and 484 trees per acre (tpa) representing spacings of 5×10, 6×10, 7×10, 8×10, and 9×1O ft, respectively, were investigated. Land expectation values were used to determine the financially optimal thinning and final harvesting schedules (including rotation length and the timing, frequency, and intensity of thinning). Five site indices (50-90), six real alternative rates of return (ARR) (2.5 - 15.0%), and three thinning options (0, 1, and 2) were employed. Results indicate that two thinnings appear to be the financially optimal number of thinnings for most site index-ARR scenarios. The planting spacing of 8×10 ft is optimal when ARR is low, and the 9×10 ft spacing is optimal when ARR is high.
AB - Economic analyses were conducted to investigate the effects of initial planting density on the profitability of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) on nonindustrial private forestland (NIPF) in East Texas. Five planting densities of 870, 725, 620, 540, and 484 trees per acre (tpa) representing spacings of 5×10, 6×10, 7×10, 8×10, and 9×1O ft, respectively, were investigated. Land expectation values were used to determine the financially optimal thinning and final harvesting schedules (including rotation length and the timing, frequency, and intensity of thinning). Five site indices (50-90), six real alternative rates of return (ARR) (2.5 - 15.0%), and three thinning options (0, 1, and 2) were employed. Results indicate that two thinnings appear to be the financially optimal number of thinnings for most site index-ARR scenarios. The planting spacing of 8×10 ft is optimal when ARR is low, and the 9×10 ft spacing is optimal when ARR is high.
KW - Land expectation value
KW - Net present worth
KW - Optimal forest management regime
KW - Optimal planting density
KW - Profitability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16244397385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16244397385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/sjaf/29.1.16
DO - 10.1093/sjaf/29.1.16
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:16244397385
SN - 0148-4419
VL - 29
SP - 16
EP - 21
JO - Southern Journal of Applied Forestry
JF - Southern Journal of Applied Forestry
IS - 1
ER -