TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of estimating chest wall compliance on the work of breathing during exercise as determined via the modified Campbell diagram
AU - Gideon, Elizbeth A.
AU - Cross, Troy J.
AU - Coriell, Catherine L.
AU - Duke, Joseph W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Physiological Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - The modified Campbell diagram provides one of the most comprehensive assessments of the work of breathing (Wb) during exercise, wherein the resistive and elastic work of inspiration and expiration are quantified. Importantly, a necessary step in constructing the modified Campbell diagram is to obtain a value for chest wall compliance (CCW). To date, it remains unknown whether estimating or directly measuring CCWimpacts the Wb, as determined by the modified Campbell diagram. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the components of the Wb differ when the modified Campbell diagram is constructed using an estimated versus measured value of CCW. Forty-two participants (n = 26 men, 16 women) performed graded exercise to volitional exhaustion on a cycle ergometer. CCWwas measured directly at rest via quasistatic relaxation. Estimated values of CCWwere taken from prior literature. The measured value of CCWwas greater than that obtained via estimation (214 ± 52 mL/cmH2O vs. 189 ± 18 mL/cmH2O; P < 0.05). At modest-to-high minute ventilations (i.e., 50-200 L/min), the inspiratory elastic Wb was greater and expiratory resistive Wb was lower, when modified Campbell diagrams were constructed using estimated compared with measured values of CCW(P = 0.001). These differences were however small and never exceeded ±5%. Thus, although our findings demonstrate that estimating CCWhas a measurable impact on the determination of the Wb, its effect appears relatively small within a cohort of healthy adults during graded exercise.
AB - The modified Campbell diagram provides one of the most comprehensive assessments of the work of breathing (Wb) during exercise, wherein the resistive and elastic work of inspiration and expiration are quantified. Importantly, a necessary step in constructing the modified Campbell diagram is to obtain a value for chest wall compliance (CCW). To date, it remains unknown whether estimating or directly measuring CCWimpacts the Wb, as determined by the modified Campbell diagram. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the components of the Wb differ when the modified Campbell diagram is constructed using an estimated versus measured value of CCW. Forty-two participants (n = 26 men, 16 women) performed graded exercise to volitional exhaustion on a cycle ergometer. CCWwas measured directly at rest via quasistatic relaxation. Estimated values of CCWwere taken from prior literature. The measured value of CCWwas greater than that obtained via estimation (214 ± 52 mL/cmH2O vs. 189 ± 18 mL/cmH2O; P < 0.05). At modest-to-high minute ventilations (i.e., 50-200 L/min), the inspiratory elastic Wb was greater and expiratory resistive Wb was lower, when modified Campbell diagrams were constructed using estimated compared with measured values of CCW(P = 0.001). These differences were however small and never exceeded ±5%. Thus, although our findings demonstrate that estimating CCWhas a measurable impact on the determination of the Wb, its effect appears relatively small within a cohort of healthy adults during graded exercise.
KW - Modified Campbell diagram
KW - Respiratory mechanics
KW - Respiratory muscle energetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102602743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102602743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/AJPREGU.00263.2020
DO - 10.1152/AJPREGU.00263.2020
M3 - Article
C2 - 33356877
AN - SCOPUS:85102602743
SN - 0363-6119
VL - 320
SP - R268-R275
JO - American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
JF - American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
IS - 3
ER -