Abstract
In this article, I look at the complexity of the technorhetorician's place within academic institutions that promote traditional retention, promotion, and tenure procedures. First, I point out the shortcomings of current positionalities assigned to technorhetoricians. I then expand on theories of opposition as defined by Chela Sandoval (1994) in "Re-entering Cyberspace: Sciences of Resistance." I use this framework to look at the problems when creating binaries to identify online and offline work as traditional or marginal. I argue that we are a diverse and multilayered group whose members occupy many positions, emphasizing the shifting and sometimes contradictory nature of marginality in cyberspace. I conclude by pointing out possible effects of our diverse positionalities on our retention, tenure, and promotion efforts.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-55 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Computers and Composition |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Keywords
- Differential movement
- Evaluation procedures
- Ideological frameworks
- Marginality in cyberspace
- Technology and tenure
- Theories of opposition
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Computer Science
- Language and Linguistics
- Education
- Linguistics and Language