TY - JOUR
T1 - Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain
T2 - Regional patterns and uncertainties
AU - Virkkala, Anna Maria
AU - Aalto, Juha
AU - Rogers, Brendan M.
AU - Tagesson, Torbern
AU - Treat, Claire C.
AU - Natali, Susan M.
AU - Watts, Jennifer D.
AU - Potter, Stefano
AU - Lehtonen, Aleksi
AU - Mauritz, Marguerite
AU - Schuur, Edward A.G.
AU - Kochendorfer, John
AU - Zona, Donatella
AU - Oechel, Walter
AU - Kobayashi, Hideki
AU - Humphreys, Elyn
AU - Goeckede, Mathias
AU - Iwata, Hiroki
AU - Lafleur, Peter M.
AU - Euskirchen, Eugenie S.
AU - Bokhorst, Stef
AU - Marushchak, Maija
AU - Martikainen, Pertti J.
AU - Elberling, Bo
AU - Voigt, Carolina
AU - Biasi, Christina
AU - Sonnentag, Oliver
AU - Parmentier, Frans Jan W.
AU - Ueyama, Masahito
AU - Celis, Gerardo
AU - St.Louis, Vincent L.
AU - Emmerton, Craig A.
AU - Peichl, Matthias
AU - Chi, Jinshu
AU - Järveoja, Järvi
AU - Nilsson, Mats B.
AU - Oberbauer, Steven F.
AU - Torn, Margaret S.
AU - Park, Sang Jong
AU - Dolman, Han
AU - Mammarella, Ivan
AU - Chae, Namyi
AU - Poyatos, Rafael
AU - López-Blanco, Efrén
AU - Christensen, Torben Røjle
AU - Kwon, Min Jung
AU - Sachs, Torsten
AU - Holl, David
AU - Luoto, Miska
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - The regional variability in tundra and boreal carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes can be high, complicating efforts to quantify sink-source patterns across the entire region. Statistical models are increasingly used to predict (i.e., upscale) CO2 fluxes across large spatial domains, but the reliability of different modeling techniques, each with different specifications and assumptions, has not been assessed in detail. Here, we compile eddy covariance and chamber measurements of annual and growing season CO2 fluxes of gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during 1990–2015 from 148 terrestrial high-latitude (i.e., tundra and boreal) sites to analyze the spatial patterns and drivers of CO2 fluxes and test the accuracy and uncertainty of different statistical models. CO2 fluxes were upscaled at relatively high spatial resolution (1 km2) across the high-latitude region using five commonly used statistical models and their ensemble, that is, the median of all five models, using climatic, vegetation, and soil predictors. We found the performance of machine learning and ensemble predictions to outperform traditional regression methods. We also found the predictive performance of NEE-focused models to be low, relative to models predicting GPP and ER. Our data compilation and ensemble predictions showed that CO2 sink strength was larger in the boreal biome (observed and predicted average annual NEE −46 and −29 g C m−2 yr−1, respectively) compared to tundra (average annual NEE +10 and −2 g C m−2 yr−1). This pattern was associated with large spatial variability, reflecting local heterogeneity in soil organic carbon stocks, climate, and vegetation productivity. The terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget, estimated using the annual NEE ensemble prediction, suggests the high-latitude region was on average an annual CO2 sink during 1990–2015, although uncertainty remains high.
AB - The regional variability in tundra and boreal carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes can be high, complicating efforts to quantify sink-source patterns across the entire region. Statistical models are increasingly used to predict (i.e., upscale) CO2 fluxes across large spatial domains, but the reliability of different modeling techniques, each with different specifications and assumptions, has not been assessed in detail. Here, we compile eddy covariance and chamber measurements of annual and growing season CO2 fluxes of gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during 1990–2015 from 148 terrestrial high-latitude (i.e., tundra and boreal) sites to analyze the spatial patterns and drivers of CO2 fluxes and test the accuracy and uncertainty of different statistical models. CO2 fluxes were upscaled at relatively high spatial resolution (1 km2) across the high-latitude region using five commonly used statistical models and their ensemble, that is, the median of all five models, using climatic, vegetation, and soil predictors. We found the performance of machine learning and ensemble predictions to outperform traditional regression methods. We also found the predictive performance of NEE-focused models to be low, relative to models predicting GPP and ER. Our data compilation and ensemble predictions showed that CO2 sink strength was larger in the boreal biome (observed and predicted average annual NEE −46 and −29 g C m−2 yr−1, respectively) compared to tundra (average annual NEE +10 and −2 g C m−2 yr−1). This pattern was associated with large spatial variability, reflecting local heterogeneity in soil organic carbon stocks, climate, and vegetation productivity. The terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget, estimated using the annual NEE ensemble prediction, suggests the high-latitude region was on average an annual CO2 sink during 1990–2015, although uncertainty remains high.
KW - Arctic
KW - CO balance
KW - empirical
KW - greenhouse gas
KW - land
KW - permafrost
KW - remote sensing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107431149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107431149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/gcb.15659
DO - 10.1111/gcb.15659
M3 - Article
C2 - 33913236
AN - SCOPUS:85107431149
SN - 1354-1013
VL - 27
SP - 4040
EP - 4059
JO - Global change biology
JF - Global change biology
IS - 17
ER -