TY - JOUR
T1 - Soil compaction associated with cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting of a coniferous forest
AU - Han, Sang Kyun
AU - Han, Han Sup
AU - Page-Dumroese, Deborah S.
AU - Johnson, Leonard R.
PY - 2009/5
Y1 - 2009/5
N2 - The degree and extent of soil compaction, which may reduce productivity of forest soils, is believed to vary by the type of harvesting system, and a field-based study was conducted to compare soil compaction from cut-to-length (CTL) and whole-tree (WT) harvesting operations. The CTL harvesting system used less area to transport logs to the landings than did the WT harvesting system (19%-20% vs. 24%-25%). At high soil moisture levels (25%-30%), both CTL and WT harvestings caused a significant increase of soil resistance to penetration (SRP) and bulk, density (BD) in the track compared with the undisturbed area (p < 0.05). In the center of trails, however, only WT harvesting resulted in a significant increase of SRP and BD compared with the undisturbed area (p < 0.05). Slash covered 69% of the forwarding trail area in the CTL harvesting units; 37% was covered by heavy slash (40 kg-m'"2) while 32% was covered by light slash (7.3 kg-m'"2). Heavy slash was more effective in reducing soil compaction in the CTL units (p < 0.05). Prediction models were developed that can be used, to estimate percent increases in SRP and. BD over undisturbed areas for both CTL and WT harvesting systems.
AB - The degree and extent of soil compaction, which may reduce productivity of forest soils, is believed to vary by the type of harvesting system, and a field-based study was conducted to compare soil compaction from cut-to-length (CTL) and whole-tree (WT) harvesting operations. The CTL harvesting system used less area to transport logs to the landings than did the WT harvesting system (19%-20% vs. 24%-25%). At high soil moisture levels (25%-30%), both CTL and WT harvestings caused a significant increase of soil resistance to penetration (SRP) and bulk, density (BD) in the track compared with the undisturbed area (p < 0.05). In the center of trails, however, only WT harvesting resulted in a significant increase of SRP and BD compared with the undisturbed area (p < 0.05). Slash covered 69% of the forwarding trail area in the CTL harvesting units; 37% was covered by heavy slash (40 kg-m'"2) while 32% was covered by light slash (7.3 kg-m'"2). Heavy slash was more effective in reducing soil compaction in the CTL units (p < 0.05). Prediction models were developed that can be used, to estimate percent increases in SRP and. BD over undisturbed areas for both CTL and WT harvesting systems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66249140922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66249140922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1139/X09-027
DO - 10.1139/X09-027
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:66249140922
SN - 0045-5067
VL - 39
SP - 976
EP - 989
JO - Canadian Journal of Forest Research
JF - Canadian Journal of Forest Research
IS - 5
ER -