TY - JOUR
T1 - Shaking in the southeastern united states
T2 - Examining earthquakes and blasts in the central georgia-south carolina seismic region
AU - Marzen, Rachel E.
AU - Gaherty, James B.
AU - Shillington, Donna J.
AU - Kim, Won Young
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Seismological Society of America. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Seismicity in the southeastern United States is relatively poorly characterized and thus notwell understood. Structures and heterogeneities from multiple stages of Appalachian orogenesis, continental rifting, and magmatism as well as rivers and reservoirs may be influencing seismic activity in the region, but previous constraints are limited. The addition of seismic stations fromthe U.S. Transportable Array and the Southeastern Suture of the Appalachian Margin Experiment Array in 2012-2014 provide an opportunity to characterize seismicity in the central Georgia-South Carolina region. We develop a seismic catalog of > 1000 events from March 2012 to May 2014 within or near the instrument array boundaries 30.1°-35.2°N, 80.9°- 85.7°W. Many of the events detected were industrial blasts, so multiple strategies were tested to discriminate between earthquakes and blasts based on event locations, timing, and spectral amplitude of the P and S arrivals. Based on this analysis, ∼10% of the events in the catalogwere classified as earthquakes. Most earthquakes southeast of the eastern Tennessee seismic zone are located in the Carolina terrane, particularly where the Carolina terrane intersects major rivers or reservoirs. One prominent region of seismicity along the Savannah River near Thurmond Lake corresponds with an ∼4:5 m rise in water levels in 2013. A temporal cluster of earthquakes in April 2013 was followed by increased levels of ambient seismicity preceding the nearbyMw 4.1 earthquake in 2014. Focalmechanisms based on first-motion polarities indicate strike-slip to oblique-thrust motion on structures trending approximately north- south or east-west, and a maximum horizontal stress orientation consistent with the regional trend of ∼N60°E, implying that seismicity may reactivate more optimally oriented structures in the Carolina terrane that are oblique to the trend of the Appalachians. Seismicity in central Georgia appears to be controlled by a complex interaction between preexisting crustal structure and hydrologic variability.
AB - Seismicity in the southeastern United States is relatively poorly characterized and thus notwell understood. Structures and heterogeneities from multiple stages of Appalachian orogenesis, continental rifting, and magmatism as well as rivers and reservoirs may be influencing seismic activity in the region, but previous constraints are limited. The addition of seismic stations fromthe U.S. Transportable Array and the Southeastern Suture of the Appalachian Margin Experiment Array in 2012-2014 provide an opportunity to characterize seismicity in the central Georgia-South Carolina region. We develop a seismic catalog of > 1000 events from March 2012 to May 2014 within or near the instrument array boundaries 30.1°-35.2°N, 80.9°- 85.7°W. Many of the events detected were industrial blasts, so multiple strategies were tested to discriminate between earthquakes and blasts based on event locations, timing, and spectral amplitude of the P and S arrivals. Based on this analysis, ∼10% of the events in the catalogwere classified as earthquakes. Most earthquakes southeast of the eastern Tennessee seismic zone are located in the Carolina terrane, particularly where the Carolina terrane intersects major rivers or reservoirs. One prominent region of seismicity along the Savannah River near Thurmond Lake corresponds with an ∼4:5 m rise in water levels in 2013. A temporal cluster of earthquakes in April 2013 was followed by increased levels of ambient seismicity preceding the nearbyMw 4.1 earthquake in 2014. Focalmechanisms based on first-motion polarities indicate strike-slip to oblique-thrust motion on structures trending approximately north- south or east-west, and a maximum horizontal stress orientation consistent with the regional trend of ∼N60°E, implying that seismicity may reactivate more optimally oriented structures in the Carolina terrane that are oblique to the trend of the Appalachians. Seismicity in central Georgia appears to be controlled by a complex interaction between preexisting crustal structure and hydrologic variability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114637158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114637158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1785/0220210029
DO - 10.1785/0220210029
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114637158
SN - 0895-0695
VL - 92
SP - 3145
EP - 3164
JO - Seismological Research Letters
JF - Seismological Research Letters
IS - 5
ER -