TY - JOUR
T1 - Semantic blindness
T2 - Repeated Concepts Are Difficult to Encode and Recall Under Time Pressure
AU - Mackay, Donald G.
AU - Miller, Michelle D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Aspects of this report were presented at UCLA and UC Berkeley in October 1992 and at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St Louis, November 1992 Support from National Institute on Aging Grant 1 R01 AG 09755 to Donald G MacKay and a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship to Michelle D Miller is gratefully acknowledged We thank Lise Abrams for setting up our computer program Nancy Barba for creating the Spanish-English translations, Sarah Schuster for running subjects, and Deborah Burke for generously lending GenPrime and other equipment essential for this study and for helpful comments on an earlier version of this article
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1994/1
Y1 - 1994/1
N2 - This study demonstrates a recently predicted cognitive phenomenon known as semantic blindness, an inhibitory effect attributable to concept repetition in the serial recall of rapidly presented sentences Proficient bilinguals read mixed, Spanish-English sentences, each including a target and a pretarget word Targets and pretargets were related in three ways They were identical (e g, like-like), semantically identical across languages (e g, gusta-like), and nonidentical within or across languages (e g, read-like) Equivalent repetition blindness was found for targets with identical and semantically identical pretargets, indicating that repetition deficits were occurring solely at the semantic level, rather than at orthographic or phonological levels.
AB - This study demonstrates a recently predicted cognitive phenomenon known as semantic blindness, an inhibitory effect attributable to concept repetition in the serial recall of rapidly presented sentences Proficient bilinguals read mixed, Spanish-English sentences, each including a target and a pretarget word Targets and pretargets were related in three ways They were identical (e g, like-like), semantically identical across languages (e g, gusta-like), and nonidentical within or across languages (e g, read-like) Equivalent repetition blindness was found for targets with identical and semantically identical pretargets, indicating that repetition deficits were occurring solely at the semantic level, rather than at orthographic or phonological levels.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965402090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965402090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00614.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00614.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84965402090
SN - 0956-7976
VL - 5
SP - 52
EP - 55
JO - Psychological Science
JF - Psychological Science
IS - 1
ER -