Sampling through the lens of QRPs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

From an ethical standpoint, it is important that we ensure that our sampling procedures allow us to make generalizations about the populations we wish to represent. In this commentary, we agree with the perspective offered by Kim and Chen (2025), though we would also suggest that we broaden their call to action into a larger consideration of the researcher decisions that scholars make when conducting research. We are particularly interested in the role played by what has been termed questionable research practices (QPRs), that is, actions that fall somewhere between typically agreed upon research actions on the one side and research misconduct on the other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100280
JournalResearch Methods in Applied Linguistics
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Questionable research practices
  • Research ethics
  • Sampling practices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sampling through the lens of QRPs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this