TY - JOUR
T1 - Return on investments in restoration and fuel treatments in frequent-fire forests of the American west
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Hjerpe, Evan E.
AU - Colavito, Melanie M.
AU - Waltz, Amy E.M.
AU - Meador, Andrew Sánchez
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Arid forests in the American West contend with overly dense stands and a need to reduce fuels and restore more natural fire regimes. Forest restoration efforts include fuel treatments, such as thinning and prescribed burning, that can reduce ground and ladder fuels. Restoration and fuel treatments have emerged as leading wildfire risk-reduction strategies in the American West, yet little is known about the cost-effectiveness of such programs. To evaluate forest restoration and fuel treatment benefits and costs, we conducted a meta-analysis of benefit-cost ratios for restoration benefit types documented in the literature for Western U.S. dry mixed conifer forests at risk of uncharacteristic wildfires. A total of 120 observations were collated from 16 studies conducted over the last two decades, with benefits ranging from enhanced ecosystem services to extensively avoided wildfire costs. Significant variation in the value of restoration and fuel treatment benefit types was found, indicating that restoration benefits differ in value based on societal importance. Overall, 17 individual benefit types were aggregated to show that in the most valuable and at-risk watersheds, every dollar invested in forest restoration can provide up to seven dollars of return in the form of benefits and provide a return-on-investment of 600%.
AB - Arid forests in the American West contend with overly dense stands and a need to reduce fuels and restore more natural fire regimes. Forest restoration efforts include fuel treatments, such as thinning and prescribed burning, that can reduce ground and ladder fuels. Restoration and fuel treatments have emerged as leading wildfire risk-reduction strategies in the American West, yet little is known about the cost-effectiveness of such programs. To evaluate forest restoration and fuel treatment benefits and costs, we conducted a meta-analysis of benefit-cost ratios for restoration benefit types documented in the literature for Western U.S. dry mixed conifer forests at risk of uncharacteristic wildfires. A total of 120 observations were collated from 16 studies conducted over the last two decades, with benefits ranging from enhanced ecosystem services to extensively avoided wildfire costs. Significant variation in the value of restoration and fuel treatment benefit types was found, indicating that restoration benefits differ in value based on societal importance. Overall, 17 individual benefit types were aggregated to show that in the most valuable and at-risk watersheds, every dollar invested in forest restoration can provide up to seven dollars of return in the form of benefits and provide a return-on-investment of 600%.
KW - Avoided wildfire costs
KW - Benefit-cost analysis
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Forest restoration
KW - Fuel treatments
KW - Restoration economics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193786980&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193786980&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108244
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108244
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85193786980
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 223
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
M1 - 108244
ER -