Research synthesis

Jesse Egbert, Paul Baker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this chapter, we attempt to synthesise the findings from the previous ten analysis chapters by conducting a comparative meta-analysis in order to answer our overarching research question about the extent to which different approaches to a corpus yield the same results. First, we describe how we carried out the meta-analysis in terms of identifying and comparing findings across the ten chapters. Then we discuss how the findings related to the research questions set, noting that as a by-product of their analysis, some of the authors actually answered a question which was not given to them. We then discuss the extent to which the findings were convergent, complementary, or dissonant, focussing in most detail on those which were dissonant. This is followed by a reflection of the different methods that were used, where we revisit the chapters again, as well as consider the broad categories of corpus-driven, corpus-based, and qualitative approaches. The chapter ends with a consideration of the benefits and challenges of methodological triangulation within corpus linguistics, as well as a discussion of the limitations and implications of our study and suggestions for future research in this area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTriangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages183-208
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9781317532088
ISBN (Print)9781138850255
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 10 2016
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Research synthesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this