TY - JOUR
T1 - Regional-scale application of lidar
T2 - Variation in forest canopy structure across the southeastern US
AU - Hansen, Andrew J.
AU - Phillips, Linda B.
AU - Dubayah, Ralph
AU - Goetz, Scott
AU - Hofton, Michelle
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the NASA Award Number, NNX09AK20G . Dave Theobald provided data on land use and topographic position. Climate data were processed by Tony Chang. Chengquan Huang provided data on time since disturbance. Jim Robson-Cox provided statistical advice. Travis Belote provided helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Canopy structure is a fundamental property of forest ecosystems that influences microclimate, runoff, decomposition, nutrient cycling, forest disturbance, carbon storage, and biodiversity. Unlike ecosystem properties such as vegetation production, canopy structure mapping is limited by measurement constraints and is primarily measured for small areas. Consequently, few large scale studies of carbon budgets, nutrient cycling, and biodiversity use quantitative data on canopy structure. Progress in broad scale mapping of canopy structure has recently been made by merging field, airborne lidar, and satellite data. As a step towards regional mapping of canopy structure with lidar and satellite data, we examine patterns of lidar-derived canopy structure across five ecoregions from Maryland to Mississippi and evaluate relationships with climate, topography, and soils. We used NASA's Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor (LVIS) to quantify canopy height, canopy cover, diversity of cover, and upper and lower canopy ratio metric along a 4000-km transect. Controlling for stand age, we found that canopy structure varied among undisturbed, closed-canopy stands across the study area. Compared with the Southeast Plains Ecoregion, the Blue Ridge and Central Appalachians ecoregions were greater in canopy height (25%), canopy cover (18%), and cover in the upper third of the canopy (212%). Values in the Piedmont were similar to those in the Southeast Plains. Locations highest in canopy structure were intermediate in temperature, growing season precipitation, topographic complexity and were located on sandy soils. The strength of biophysical models differed among ecoregions, explaining 13% of the variation in canopy height in the Southeastern Plain to 60% in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion. Canopy structure also differed among disturbance classes. Undisturbed forests were 30% higher in canopy height, 15% higher in canopy cover, and 18% higher in cover of the upper third of the canopy than disturbed forests. Managed pine plantations were intermediate in canopy structure between disturbed and undisturbed forests. This study demonstrates that airborne lidar data can be used to distinguish differences in canopy structure among undisturbed forests in varying biophysical settings and between undisturbed and disturbed forests across sub-continental transects. The results suggest that airborne lidar data in conjunction with data on biophysical gradients can be used as a basis for extrapolating canopy structure at fine spatial scales across regional extents. This would allow for fine-scale characterization of forest structure continuously across large regions. Such methods should allow breakthroughs in the use of canopy structure in ecosystem management and global change studies.
AB - Canopy structure is a fundamental property of forest ecosystems that influences microclimate, runoff, decomposition, nutrient cycling, forest disturbance, carbon storage, and biodiversity. Unlike ecosystem properties such as vegetation production, canopy structure mapping is limited by measurement constraints and is primarily measured for small areas. Consequently, few large scale studies of carbon budgets, nutrient cycling, and biodiversity use quantitative data on canopy structure. Progress in broad scale mapping of canopy structure has recently been made by merging field, airborne lidar, and satellite data. As a step towards regional mapping of canopy structure with lidar and satellite data, we examine patterns of lidar-derived canopy structure across five ecoregions from Maryland to Mississippi and evaluate relationships with climate, topography, and soils. We used NASA's Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor (LVIS) to quantify canopy height, canopy cover, diversity of cover, and upper and lower canopy ratio metric along a 4000-km transect. Controlling for stand age, we found that canopy structure varied among undisturbed, closed-canopy stands across the study area. Compared with the Southeast Plains Ecoregion, the Blue Ridge and Central Appalachians ecoregions were greater in canopy height (25%), canopy cover (18%), and cover in the upper third of the canopy (212%). Values in the Piedmont were similar to those in the Southeast Plains. Locations highest in canopy structure were intermediate in temperature, growing season precipitation, topographic complexity and were located on sandy soils. The strength of biophysical models differed among ecoregions, explaining 13% of the variation in canopy height in the Southeastern Plain to 60% in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion. Canopy structure also differed among disturbance classes. Undisturbed forests were 30% higher in canopy height, 15% higher in canopy cover, and 18% higher in cover of the upper third of the canopy than disturbed forests. Managed pine plantations were intermediate in canopy structure between disturbed and undisturbed forests. This study demonstrates that airborne lidar data can be used to distinguish differences in canopy structure among undisturbed forests in varying biophysical settings and between undisturbed and disturbed forests across sub-continental transects. The results suggest that airborne lidar data in conjunction with data on biophysical gradients can be used as a basis for extrapolating canopy structure at fine spatial scales across regional extents. This would allow for fine-scale characterization of forest structure continuously across large regions. Such methods should allow breakthroughs in the use of canopy structure in ecosystem management and global change studies.
KW - Canopy cover
KW - Canopy richness
KW - Disturbed forest
KW - LVIS
KW - Lidar
KW - Southeast United States
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904472021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904472021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84904472021
SN - 0378-1127
VL - 329
SP - 214
EP - 226
JO - Forest Ecology and Management
JF - Forest Ecology and Management
ER -