Rater reliability of the tuck jump assessment: A critically appraised topic (cat)

Michael D. McAdie; Monica R. Lininger; Meghan Warren

doi:10.1123/ijatt.2019-0086

Rater reliability of the tuck jump assessment: A critically appraised topic (cat)

Michael D. McAdie
, Monica R. Lininger
, Meghan Warren

Physical Therapy and Athletic Training

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Focused Clinical Question: In an individual who is physically active in recreation or sport, can the tuck jump assessment be reliably scored? Clinical Bottom Line: Current evidence regarding the reliability of the original tuck jump assessment and modified tuck jump assessment are conflicting.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	13-19
Number of pages	7
Journal	International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training
Volume	26
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1123/ijatt.2019-0086
State	Published - 2021

Keywords

Functional screening
Injury prevention
Interrater
Intrarater
Psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1123/ijatt.2019-0086

Cite this

@article{acf1c0fb853c4c88819dc007fdf8320f,

title = "Rater reliability of the tuck jump assessment: A critically appraised topic (cat)",

abstract = "Focused Clinical Question: In an individual who is physically active in recreation or sport, can the tuck jump assessment be reliably scored? Clinical Bottom Line: Current evidence regarding the reliability of the original tuck jump assessment and modified tuck jump assessment are conflicting.",

keywords = "Functional screening, Injury prevention, Interrater, Intrarater, Psychometrics",

author = "McAdie, \{Michael D.\} and Lininger, \{Monica R.\} and Meghan Warren",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Human Kinetics, Inc.",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1123/ijatt.2019-0086",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "26",

pages = "13--19",

journal = "International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training",

issn = "2157-7285",

publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rater reliability of the tuck jump assessment

T2 - A critically appraised topic (cat)

AU - McAdie, Michael D.

AU - Lininger, Monica R.

AU - Warren, Meghan

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Focused Clinical Question: In an individual who is physically active in recreation or sport, can the tuck jump assessment be reliably scored? Clinical Bottom Line: Current evidence regarding the reliability of the original tuck jump assessment and modified tuck jump assessment are conflicting.

AB - Focused Clinical Question: In an individual who is physically active in recreation or sport, can the tuck jump assessment be reliably scored? Clinical Bottom Line: Current evidence regarding the reliability of the original tuck jump assessment and modified tuck jump assessment are conflicting.

KW - Functional screening

KW - Injury prevention

KW - Interrater

KW - Intrarater

KW - Psychometrics

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85100626376

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85100626376#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1123/ijatt.2019-0086

DO - 10.1123/ijatt.2019-0086

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85100626376

SN - 2157-7285

VL - 26

SP - 13

EP - 19

JO - International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training

JF - International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training

IS - 1

ER -

Rater reliability of the tuck jump assessment: A critically appraised topic (cat)

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this