Abstract
Employing a natural language processing approach, we analyzed textual content derived from publicly-available athlete victim impact statements (VIS) from the Larry Nassar trial (N = 111) to examine psychosocial responses to sexual violence. To explore potential differences in a non-sports context, we conducted similar analyses on a sample of #MeToo tweets (N = 45,848). Our research focused on the semantic content of VIS, including positive and negative affect, power and trust dynamics, well-being, and post-traumatic growth. We hypothesized that athletes’ reactions to sexual violence would be more likely to contain language related to power and trust. Traditional null-hypothesis significance testing and network analyses were used to identify the psychosocial indicators unique to sexual violence disclosures in a sports context. Results indicated differential use of language related to negative affect, trust, power dynamics, and post-traumatic growth in sports versus non-sports contexts. We discuss clinical, practical, and policy-based implications for risk reduction and intervention.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 290-310 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Disclosure
- Female athletes
- SEANCE
- Sexual violence
- Text analysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology