Abstract
A recent effort in archaeological critique by Cordell et al. (1987) is undermined by confusion, misunderstanding, and misrepresentation. This comment on their paper illustrates how confusion may arise when the literature of the American Southwest is not read carefully and the causes of variability in the archaeological record are understood incompletely.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 802-814 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | American Antiquity |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1 1989 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Archaeology
- Museology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Perception and Interpretation in Contemporary Southwestern Archaeology: Comments on Cordell, Upham, and Brock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS