Online Toxic Communication about the Accounting Academic Job Market

Cristina T. Alberti, Landi Morris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study explores the use of online toxic communication and how it impacts perceptions of DEI in the accounting academic community. During a recent job market season, we observed the use of toxic communication, including racism, sexism, and hate speech, in the form of anonymous posts made to two online job market forums. Using qualitative methods, including analysis of the online forums and a survey of job market participants, we find that forum language implies that unqualified candidates receive preferential treatment in the job market based on their race or gender, often referring to these individuals as “diversity hires.” Forum language also states that candidates from historically marginalized communities face discrimination in this process. Importantly, we find that toxic communication negatively impacts candidates’ views of DEI within the accounting academy. Overall, this study serves as a call to action to leadership to identify and denounce toxic communication within our community. JEL Classifications: M40; M49.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-26
Number of pages20
JournalAccounting Horizons
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • accounting academy
  • accounting faculty
  • DEI
  • diversity
  • job market
  • toxic communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Online Toxic Communication about the Accounting Academic Job Market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this