Occam's Razor and Non-Voluntarist Accounts of Political Authority

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Certain non-voluntarists have recently defended political authority by advancing views with a two-fold structure. First, they argue that the state, or the law, is best (or uniquely) capable of accomplishing something important. Second, they defend a substantive normative principle on which being so situated is sufficient for de jure authority. Widely accepted tenets undermine all such views.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-173
Number of pages15
JournalDialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Keywords

  • non-voluntarist
  • normative consent
  • Occam's Razor
  • philosophical anarchism
  • political authority
  • Samaritanism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Occam's Razor and Non-Voluntarist Accounts of Political Authority'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this