TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel metrics for relating personal heat exposure to social risk factors and outdoor ambient temperature
AU - Hondula, David M.
AU - Kuras, Evan R.
AU - Betzel, Summer
AU - Drake, Lauren
AU - Eneboe, Jason
AU - Kaml, Miranda
AU - Munoz, Mary
AU - Sevig, Mara
AU - Singh, Marianna
AU - Ruddell, Benjamin L.
AU - Harlan, Sharon L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - A more precise understanding of individual-level heat exposure may be helpful to advance knowledge about heat-health impacts and effective intervention strategies, especially in light of projected increases in the severity and frequency of extreme heat events. We developed and interrogated different metrics for quantifying personal heat exposure and explored their association with social risk factors. To do so, we collected simultaneous personal heat exposure data from 64 residents of metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. From these data, we derived five exposure metrics: Mean Individually Experienced Temperature (IET), Maximum IET, Longest Exposure Period (LEP), Percentage Minutes Above Threshold (PMAT), and Degree Minutes Above Threshold (DMAT), and calculated each for Day Hours, Night Hours, and All Hours of the study period. We then calculated effect sizes for the associations between those metrics and four social risk factors: neighborhood vulnerability, income, home cooling type, and time spent outside. We also investigated exposure misclassification by constructing linear regression models of observations from a regional weather station and hourly IET for each participant. Our analysis revealed that metric choice and timeframe added depth and nuance to our understanding of differences in exposure within and between populations. We found that time spent outside and income were the two risk factors most strongly associated with personal heat exposure. We also found evidence that Mean IET is a good, but perhaps not optimal, measure for assessing group differences in exposure. Most participants’ IETs were poorly correlated with regional weather station observations and the slope and correlation coefficient for linear regression models between regional weather station data and IETs varied widely among participants. We recommend continued efforts to investigate personal heat exposure, especially in combination with physiological indicators, to improve our understanding of links between ambient temperatures, social risk factors, and health outcomes.
AB - A more precise understanding of individual-level heat exposure may be helpful to advance knowledge about heat-health impacts and effective intervention strategies, especially in light of projected increases in the severity and frequency of extreme heat events. We developed and interrogated different metrics for quantifying personal heat exposure and explored their association with social risk factors. To do so, we collected simultaneous personal heat exposure data from 64 residents of metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. From these data, we derived five exposure metrics: Mean Individually Experienced Temperature (IET), Maximum IET, Longest Exposure Period (LEP), Percentage Minutes Above Threshold (PMAT), and Degree Minutes Above Threshold (DMAT), and calculated each for Day Hours, Night Hours, and All Hours of the study period. We then calculated effect sizes for the associations between those metrics and four social risk factors: neighborhood vulnerability, income, home cooling type, and time spent outside. We also investigated exposure misclassification by constructing linear regression models of observations from a regional weather station and hourly IET for each participant. Our analysis revealed that metric choice and timeframe added depth and nuance to our understanding of differences in exposure within and between populations. We found that time spent outside and income were the two risk factors most strongly associated with personal heat exposure. We also found evidence that Mean IET is a good, but perhaps not optimal, measure for assessing group differences in exposure. Most participants’ IETs were poorly correlated with regional weather station observations and the slope and correlation coefficient for linear regression models between regional weather station data and IETs varied widely among participants. We recommend continued efforts to investigate personal heat exposure, especially in combination with physiological indicators, to improve our understanding of links between ambient temperatures, social risk factors, and health outcomes.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Climate
KW - Health
KW - Individually experienced temperature
KW - Misclassification
KW - Urban
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098455405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098455405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106271
DO - 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106271
M3 - Article
C2 - 33395929
AN - SCOPUS:85098455405
SN - 0160-4120
VL - 146
JO - Environment international
JF - Environment international
M1 - 106271
ER -