TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuromechanics
T2 - An integrative approach for understanding motor control
AU - Nishikawa, Kiisa
AU - Biewener, Andrew A.
AU - Aerts, Peter
AU - Ahn, Anna N.
AU - Chiel, Hillel J.
AU - Daley, Monica A.
AU - Daniel, Thomas L.
AU - Full, Robert J.
AU - Hale, Melina E.
AU - Hedrick, Tyson L.
AU - Lappin, A. Kristopher
AU - Nichols, T. Richard
AU - Quinn, Roger D.
AU - Satterlie, Richard A.
AU - Szymik, Brett
N1 - Funding Information:
The symposium on which this review was based was supported by grant NS055623 from the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, and by the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, including the Divisions of Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Neuroscience, and Vertebrate Morphology. The research reported herein was supported by grants NS20855, NS40405 and HD32571 to TRN; AR047679 to AAB; R25-GM56931, IBN-0240349, and IBN-0623791 to KCN. Sandra Nauwelaerts and Kristianne D’Août (University of Antwerp) provided helpful input on portions of the manuscript.
PY - 2007/7
Y1 - 2007/7
N2 - Neuromechanics seeks to understand how muscles, sense organs, motor pattern generators, and brain interact to produce coordinated movement, not only in complex terrain but also when confronted with unexpected perturbations. Applications of neuromechanics include ameliorating human health problems (including prosthesis design and restoration of movement following brain or spinal cord injury), as well as the design, actuation and control of mobile robots. In animals, coordinated movement emerges from the interplay among descending output from the central nervous system, sensory input from body and environment, muscle dynamics, and the emergent dynamics of the whole animal. The inevitable coupling between neural information processing and the emergent mechanical behavior of animals is a central theme of neuromechanics. Fundamentally, motor control involves a series of transformations of information, from brain and spinal cord to muscles to body, and back to brain. The control problem revolves around the specific transfer functions that describe each transformation. The transfer functions depend on the rules of organization and operation that determine the dynamic behavior of each subsystem (i.e., central processing, force generation, emergent dynamics, and sensory processing). In this review, we (1) consider the contributions of muscles, (2) sensory processing, and (3) central networks to motor control, (4) provide examples to illustrate the interplay among brain, muscles, sense organs and the environment in the control of movement, and (5) describe advances in both robotics and neuromechanics that have emerged from application of biological principles in robotic design. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that (1) intrinsic properties of muscle contribute to dynamic stability and control of movement, particularly immediately after perturbations; (2) proprioceptive feedback reinforces these intrinsic self-stabilizing properties of muscle; (3) control systems must contend with inevitable time delays that can simplify or complicate control; and (4) like most animals under a variety of circumstances, some robots use a trial and error process to tune central feedforward control to emergent body dynamics.
AB - Neuromechanics seeks to understand how muscles, sense organs, motor pattern generators, and brain interact to produce coordinated movement, not only in complex terrain but also when confronted with unexpected perturbations. Applications of neuromechanics include ameliorating human health problems (including prosthesis design and restoration of movement following brain or spinal cord injury), as well as the design, actuation and control of mobile robots. In animals, coordinated movement emerges from the interplay among descending output from the central nervous system, sensory input from body and environment, muscle dynamics, and the emergent dynamics of the whole animal. The inevitable coupling between neural information processing and the emergent mechanical behavior of animals is a central theme of neuromechanics. Fundamentally, motor control involves a series of transformations of information, from brain and spinal cord to muscles to body, and back to brain. The control problem revolves around the specific transfer functions that describe each transformation. The transfer functions depend on the rules of organization and operation that determine the dynamic behavior of each subsystem (i.e., central processing, force generation, emergent dynamics, and sensory processing). In this review, we (1) consider the contributions of muscles, (2) sensory processing, and (3) central networks to motor control, (4) provide examples to illustrate the interplay among brain, muscles, sense organs and the environment in the control of movement, and (5) describe advances in both robotics and neuromechanics that have emerged from application of biological principles in robotic design. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that (1) intrinsic properties of muscle contribute to dynamic stability and control of movement, particularly immediately after perturbations; (2) proprioceptive feedback reinforces these intrinsic self-stabilizing properties of muscle; (3) control systems must contend with inevitable time delays that can simplify or complicate control; and (4) like most animals under a variety of circumstances, some robots use a trial and error process to tune central feedforward control to emergent body dynamics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448968412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448968412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/icb/icm024
DO - 10.1093/icb/icm024
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:35448968412
SN - 1540-7063
VL - 47
SP - 16
EP - 54
JO - Integrative and Comparative Biology
JF - Integrative and Comparative Biology
IS - 1
ER -