TY - JOUR
T1 - Methodological uncertainty in estimating carbon turnover times of soil fractions
AU - Feng, Wenting
AU - Shi, Zheng
AU - Jiang, Jiang
AU - Xia, Jianyang
AU - Liang, Junyi
AU - Zhou, Jizhong
AU - Luo, Yiqi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Improving predictions of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics by multi-compartment models requires validation of turnover times of different SOC pools. Techniques such as laboratory incubation and isotope analysis have been adopted to estimate C turnover times, yet no studies have systematically compared these techniques and assessed the uncertainties associated with them. Here, we tested whether C turnover times of soil fractions were biased by methodology, and how this changed across soil particle sizes and ecosystems. We identified 52 studies that quantified C turnover times in different soil particles fractionated either according to aggregate size (e.g., macro- versus micro-aggregates) or according to soil texture (e.g., sand versus silt versus clay). C turnover times of these soil fractions were estimated by one of three methods: laboratory incubation (16 studies), δ13C shift due to C3-C4 vegetation change (25 studies), and 14C dating (19 studies). All methods showed that C turnover times of soil fractions generally increase with decreasing soil particle size. However, estimates of C turnover times within soil fractions differed significantly among methods, with incubation estimating the shortest turnover times and 14C the longest. The short C turnover times estimated by incubation are likely due to optimal environmental conditions for microbial decomposition existing in these studies, which is often a poor representation of field conditions. The 13C method can only be used when documenting a successive C3 versus C4 vegetation shift. C turnover times estimated by 14C were systematically higher than those estimated by 13C, especially for fine soil fractions (i.e., silt and clay). Overall, our findings highlight methodological uncertainties in estimating C turnover times of soil fractions, and correction factors should be explored to account for methodological bias when C turnover times estimated from different methods are used to parameterize soil C models.
AB - Improving predictions of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics by multi-compartment models requires validation of turnover times of different SOC pools. Techniques such as laboratory incubation and isotope analysis have been adopted to estimate C turnover times, yet no studies have systematically compared these techniques and assessed the uncertainties associated with them. Here, we tested whether C turnover times of soil fractions were biased by methodology, and how this changed across soil particle sizes and ecosystems. We identified 52 studies that quantified C turnover times in different soil particles fractionated either according to aggregate size (e.g., macro- versus micro-aggregates) or according to soil texture (e.g., sand versus silt versus clay). C turnover times of these soil fractions were estimated by one of three methods: laboratory incubation (16 studies), δ13C shift due to C3-C4 vegetation change (25 studies), and 14C dating (19 studies). All methods showed that C turnover times of soil fractions generally increase with decreasing soil particle size. However, estimates of C turnover times within soil fractions differed significantly among methods, with incubation estimating the shortest turnover times and 14C the longest. The short C turnover times estimated by incubation are likely due to optimal environmental conditions for microbial decomposition existing in these studies, which is often a poor representation of field conditions. The 13C method can only be used when documenting a successive C3 versus C4 vegetation shift. C turnover times estimated by 14C were systematically higher than those estimated by 13C, especially for fine soil fractions (i.e., silt and clay). Overall, our findings highlight methodological uncertainties in estimating C turnover times of soil fractions, and correction factors should be explored to account for methodological bias when C turnover times estimated from different methods are used to parameterize soil C models.
KW - C
KW - C
KW - Fraction
KW - Incubation
KW - Soil organic carbon
KW - Turnover
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975048485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975048485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84975048485
SN - 0038-0717
VL - 100
SP - 118
EP - 124
JO - Soil Biology and Biochemistry
JF - Soil Biology and Biochemistry
ER -