Abstract
In this paper, we explore an alternative explanation of the exposure puzzle, the missing variable bias in previous studies. We propose to correct the bias with the quantile regression technique invented by Koenker and Bassett (Econometrica 46:33-51, 1978). Empirically, as soon as we take into account the missing variable bias as well as time variation in currency exposure, we find that 26 out of 30 or 87 % of the US industry portfolios exhibit significant currency exposure to the Major Currencies Index, and 23 out of 30 or 77 % show significant exposure to the Other Important Trading Partners Index. Our results have important theoretical and practical implications. In terms of theoretical significance, our results strengthen the findings in Francis et al. (J Financ Econ 90:169-196, 2008), and suggest that methodological weakness, not hedging, may explain the insignificance of currency risk in previous studies. In terms of practical significance, our results suggest a simple yet efficient approach for managers to estimate currency exposure of their firms.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 549-566 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2013 |
Keywords
- Currency exposure
- Exposure puzzle
- Missing variable bias
- Quantile regression
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- General Business, Management and Accounting
- Finance