Mikhail G. Katz, Karl Kuhlemann, David Sherry, Monica Ugaglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


The way Leibniz applied his philosophy to mathematics has been the subject of longstanding debates. A key piece of evidence is his letter to Masson on bodies. We offer an interpretation of this often misunderstood text, dealing with the status of infinite divisibility in nature, rather than in mathematics. In line with this distinction, we offer a reading of the fictionality of infinitesimals. The letter has been claimed to support a reading of infinitesimals according to which they are logical fictions, contradictory in their definition, and thus absolutely impossible. The advocates of such a reading have lumped infinitesimals with infinite wholes, which are rejected by Leibniz as contradicting the partwhole principle. Far from supporting this reading, the letter is arguably consistent with the view that infinitesimals, as inassignable quantities, are mentis fictiones, i.e., (well-founded) fictions usable in mathematics, but possibly contrary to the Leibnizian principle of the harmony of things and not necessarily idealizing anything in rerum natura. Unlike infinite wholes, infinitesimals - as well as imaginary roots and other well-founded fictions - may involve accidental (as opposed to absolute) impossibilities, in accordance with the Leibnizian theories of knowledge and modality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalReview of Symbolic Logic
StateAccepted/In press - 2021


  • Aristotle
  • Bernoulli
  • Body
  • Des Bosses
  • Huygens
  • Inassignable quantities
  • Infinitesimal calculus
  • Infinitesimals
  • Infinity
  • Leibniz
  • Leibnizian metaphysics
  • Magnitude
  • Masson
  • Monad
  • Multitude
  • Substance
  • Thomasius
  • Useful fiction
  • Varignon
  • Wallis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)
  • Philosophy
  • Logic


Dive into the research topics of 'LEIBNIZ on BODIES and INFINITIES: RERUM NATURA and MATHEMATICAL FICTIONS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this