It's ok to think in a bad way: How state optimism and pessimism influence risk-taking

Cony M. Ho, Robert S. Wyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Government and public policy makers are facing an important issue on how to balance between economics and consumers' well-being. Thus, the current research proposes an important factor to help understand more on consumers risk-taking in investment. Trait optimists typically expect bright outcomes, whereas trait pessimists usually expect gloomy ones. However, the present research qualifies these generalizations. This current research proposes that optimism and pessimism can also be temporarily changed and cause different impact comparing to trait optimism and pessimism. Four studies showed that state optimists and pessimists differ in their expectations of success in a situation in which outcomes are purely a matter of chance or skills. Specifically, state optimists invest more in risky options when they believe that the investments are chance-based, whereas state pessimists invest more when they believe the investments are skill-based. These effects were due to their beliefs that the outcome is due to chance or skills. Additionally, we found that the effect will be moderated by individuals' locus of control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)801-811
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Consumer Studies
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • chance
  • risk-taking
  • skill
  • state optimism
  • state pessimism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'It's ok to think in a bad way: How state optimism and pessimism influence risk-taking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this