Is core vocabulary a friend or foe of academic writing? Single-word vs multi-word uses of THING

Sylviane Granger, Tove Larsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Core vocabulary items (e.g. thing, way) are often viewed as the enemy of effective academic writing, and style guides and textbooks often advise against using them. However, their bad reputation seems to stem from a single-word perspective that ignores the rich phraseological units that such items tend to figure in. In this study, we focus on the core vocabulary lemma THING to investigate the extent to which a phraseological approach can redeem its reputation. We look at learner essays from ten different first-language backgrounds from the International Corpus of Learner English and compare these to reference corpora from the endpoints of the informal-formal continuum: the Spoken BNC2014 and the Corpus of Academic Journal Articles. The results show that a phraseological approach indeed provides a more nuanced view of the core lemma THING: it is used in a wide variety of multi-word units, many of which common in academic writing. Although some signs of novice production are evident in the learners’ writing, their use is closest to that of the expert academic writers. The paper concludes with a discussion of the role of phraseology in vocabulary lists used in teaching and assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100999
JournalJournal of English for Academic Purposes
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Core vocabulary
  • L2 writing
  • Multi-word units
  • Phraseology
  • THING

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is core vocabulary a friend or foe of academic writing? Single-word vs multi-word uses of THING'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this