TY - JOUR
T1 - International law of the sea/seed
T2 - Public domain versus private commodity
AU - Thompson, Carol B.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the continued financial support of, and technical interaction with, IBM. One of us (M.C.H.) acknowledges RPI Graduate School Fellowship support during part of this research. We gratefully acknowledge the support of John Vaughan and Gerry DiPiazza of M/A-COM, Advanced Semiconductor Operations in providing GaAs wafers and technical perspective.
PY - 2004/6
Y1 - 2004/6
N2 - The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) prohibits privatization or territorial control over the deep seas. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) recognizes sovereign rights over biodiversity within national territories, but the World Trade Organization (WTO) permits privatization of microorganisms and plans to incorporate seeds and plants. Yet both the high seas and biodiversity (gene pool) could be viewed as the common heritage of mankind - necessary for human life, to be shared by all. Why are seeds legally treated so differently from the seabed, the former to be declared private property (WTO), the other remaining available to all (UNCLOS)? This study compares political contestations over jurisdiction for access and use, for benefit sharing and governance of the sea versus the seed. The conclusion discusses lessons from UNCLOS in delimitation of private property of global resources for resolving the current impasse over privatization of the gene pool between the CBD and WTO.
AB - The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) prohibits privatization or territorial control over the deep seas. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) recognizes sovereign rights over biodiversity within national territories, but the World Trade Organization (WTO) permits privatization of microorganisms and plans to incorporate seeds and plants. Yet both the high seas and biodiversity (gene pool) could be viewed as the common heritage of mankind - necessary for human life, to be shared by all. Why are seeds legally treated so differently from the seabed, the former to be declared private property (WTO), the other remaining available to all (UNCLOS)? This study compares political contestations over jurisdiction for access and use, for benefit sharing and governance of the sea versus the seed. The conclusion discusses lessons from UNCLOS in delimitation of private property of global resources for resolving the current impasse over privatization of the gene pool between the CBD and WTO.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13644262422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13644262422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:13644262422
SN - 0028-0739
VL - 44
SP - 841
EP - 866
JO - Natural Resources Journal
JF - Natural Resources Journal
IS - 3
ER -