Insurgent safety: Theorizing alternatives to state protection

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the United States, public safety is embraced as an unquestioned social good. Broadly speaking, the criminal justice system is tasked with administering and maintaining public safety through the use of law enforcement, the courts, and prisons. First, through a focus on racialized police violence, this article develops a critique of the dominant model of public safety practiced in the United States—identified herein as ‘carceral safety’. Second, through an analysis of findings from the (Re)imagining Public Safety Project (RPSP), this article seeks to sketch out an alternative model and practice of safety that does not rely on banishment, policing, or mass criminalization. In contradistinction to the forms of state protection exercised under the seemingly innocuous rhetoric of ‘public safety’, RPSP participants conceptualized what I am calling ‘insurgent safety’: locally determined, anti-capitalist practices and ethics for reducing, and responding to harm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-59
Number of pages17
JournalTheoretical Criminology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Penal abolition
  • police violence
  • safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Insurgent safety: Theorizing alternatives to state protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this