Information Asymmetry in Management Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Opportunities

Donald D. Bergh, David J. Ketchen, Ilaria Orlandi, Pursey P.M.A.R. Heugens, Brian K. Boyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

204 Scopus citations


Information asymmetry is a condition wherein one party in a relationship has more or better information than another. The information asymmetry concept is widely diffused throughout management research, and its existence is a core assumption within leading theories on organizations. Despite information asymmetry’s central role, however, there have been no systematic reviews of the management literature using the concept. As a result, there is no established level of knowledge of information asymmetry as a management concept, nor is there a unified basis for directing future research leveraging the concept. In response, we review 223 relevant articles from leading management journals and develop a framework for organizing and assessing information asymmetry research. We consolidate understanding of information asymmetry’s meaning, conceptual applications, roles in different theoretical models, antecedents, and how focal actors’ self-interests influence the selection of mechanisms for managing it. Further, we highlight opportunities for extensions to core management theories and specify research prospects within several management subfields. Overall, the framework can help guide researchers as they work to advance understanding of one of the management field’s most ubiquitous concepts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-158
Number of pages37
JournalJournal of Management
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes


  • asymmetric information
  • information asymmetry
  • information impactedness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management


Dive into the research topics of 'Information Asymmetry in Management Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Opportunities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this