Inclusive education national research advocacy agenda: A call to action

Mary E. Morningstar; Heather C. Allcock; Julia M. White; Deborah Taub; Jennifer A. Kurth; Jean Gonsier-Gerdin; Diane L. Ryndak; Janet Sauer; Cheryl M. Jorgensen

doi:10.1177/1540796916650975

Inclusive education national research advocacy agenda: A call to action

Mary E. Morningstar, Heather C. Allcock, Julia M. White, Deborah Taub, Jennifer A. Kurth, Jean Gonsier-Gerdin, Diane L. Ryndak, Janet Sauer, Cheryl M. Jorgensen

Educational Specialties

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

The TASH Inclusive Education National Committee responded to Horner and Dunlap's call to ensure that future research integrates inclusive values with strong science by developing an inclusive education national research advocacy agenda. Qualitative methods were implemented to answer three questions: (a) What is the state of inclusive education research? (b) What research still must be done? and (c) What are recommendations for a national inclusive education research advocacy agenda? The findings include 15 areas organized within three domains advocating for continued research across systems-level capacity building, building and classroom capacity, and student learning and development. Implications for research and policy reform are discussed.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	209-215
Number of pages	7
Journal	Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Volume	41
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916650975
State	Published - Sep 2016

Keywords

Inclusive education
Policy
Practice
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology
General Health Professions
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Access to Document

10.1177/1540796916650975

Cite this

@article{46c672adc35b49c68ef5b12a38b89dbd,

title = "Inclusive education national research advocacy agenda: A call to action",

abstract = "The TASH Inclusive Education National Committee responded to Horner and Dunlap's call to ensure that future research integrates inclusive values with strong science by developing an inclusive education national research advocacy agenda. Qualitative methods were implemented to answer three questions: (a) What is the state of inclusive education research? (b) What research still must be done? and (c) What are recommendations for a national inclusive education research advocacy agenda? The findings include 15 areas organized within three domains advocating for continued research across systems-level capacity building, building and classroom capacity, and student learning and development. Implications for research and policy reform are discussed.",

keywords = "Inclusive education, Policy, Practice, Research",

author = "Morningstar, {Mary E.} and Allcock, {Heather C.} and White, {Julia M.} and Deborah Taub and Kurth, {Jennifer A.} and Jean Gonsier-Gerdin and Ryndak, {Diane L.} and Janet Sauer and Jorgensen, {Cheryl M.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2016.",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1177/1540796916650975",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "41",

pages = "209--215",

journal = "Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities",

issn = "1540-7969",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusive education national research advocacy agenda

T2 - A call to action

AU - Morningstar, Mary E.

AU - Allcock, Heather C.

AU - White, Julia M.

AU - Taub, Deborah

AU - Kurth, Jennifer A.

AU - Gonsier-Gerdin, Jean

AU - Ryndak, Diane L.

AU - Sauer, Janet

AU - Jorgensen, Cheryl M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2016.

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - The TASH Inclusive Education National Committee responded to Horner and Dunlap's call to ensure that future research integrates inclusive values with strong science by developing an inclusive education national research advocacy agenda. Qualitative methods were implemented to answer three questions: (a) What is the state of inclusive education research? (b) What research still must be done? and (c) What are recommendations for a national inclusive education research advocacy agenda? The findings include 15 areas organized within three domains advocating for continued research across systems-level capacity building, building and classroom capacity, and student learning and development. Implications for research and policy reform are discussed.

AB - The TASH Inclusive Education National Committee responded to Horner and Dunlap's call to ensure that future research integrates inclusive values with strong science by developing an inclusive education national research advocacy agenda. Qualitative methods were implemented to answer three questions: (a) What is the state of inclusive education research? (b) What research still must be done? and (c) What are recommendations for a national inclusive education research advocacy agenda? The findings include 15 areas organized within three domains advocating for continued research across systems-level capacity building, building and classroom capacity, and student learning and development. Implications for research and policy reform are discussed.

KW - Inclusive education

KW - Policy

KW - Practice

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985993105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985993105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1540796916650975

DO - 10.1177/1540796916650975

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84985993105

SN - 1540-7969

VL - 41

SP - 209

EP - 215

JO - Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

JF - Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

IS - 3

ER -

Inclusive education national research advocacy agenda: A call to action

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this