Abstract
A representative sample (N = 302) of the wheelchair rugby population responded to a survey about the classification system based on prioritized items by International Wheelchair Rugby Federation members. Respondents stated, “The classification system is accurate but needs adjustments” (56%), “Any athlete with tetraequivalent impairment should be allowed to compete” (72%), “Athletes with cerebral palsy and other coordination impairments should be classified with a system different than the current one” (75%), and “The maximal value for trunk should be increased from 1.0 to 1.5” (67%). A minority stated, “Wheelchair rugby should only be open to spinal cord injury and other neurological conditions” (36%) and “There should be a 4.0 class” (33%). Results strongly indicated that athletes and stakeholders want adjustments to the classification system in two areas: a focus on evaluation of athletes with impairments other than loss of muscle power caused by spinal cord injury and changes in classification of trunk impairment.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 377-389 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2014 |
Keywords
- Paralympics
- Physical disabilities
- Self-determination
- Self-regulation
- Wheelchair sport
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation