TY - JOUR
T1 - Implications of newly-formed seed-dispersal mutualisms between birds and introduced plants in northern California, USA
AU - Aslan, Clare E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments I acknowledge M. Rejmánek for essential advice and assistance and for excellent mentorship throughout this research. Feedback from M. Holyoak, T. Hahn, and three anonymous reviewers enabled me to improve the manuscript substantially. M. Chinoraks and H. Jones helped with numerous data collection and fieldwork tasks, and R. Boothby, S. Chin-Shar Chu, P. Epanchin, Z. Kuspa, N. Rujanavech, E. Smith, A. Aslan, M. Bower, and G. Darin assisted with observations. R. Klinger, T. Schoener, and N. Willits provided invaluable advice on data analyses. The parks and recreation departments of Davis, Chico, and Sacramento allowed me to place fruit traps on their lands. I am deeply grateful to the Big Chico Creek Ecological Reserve, the Putah Creek Riparian Reserve, and the Yolo Audubon Society for allowing a variety of research activities on their properties and providing access to facilities and resources. This research was supported by a Montana State Center for Invasive Plant Management Seed Money Grant award and a research grant from the UC Davis Biological Invasions IGERT (NSFDGE#0114432). I was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship throughout this research. Thanks to S. Mason for study site advice, to J. Ellsworth for trap design ideas, and to O. J. and G. A. MacMillan for greatly facilitating many overnight field trips.
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - I examined the role of bird dispersal in invasiveness of three non-native plant species in California, USA: Triadica sebifera, Ligustrum lucidum, and Olea europaea. I selected these species because their invasiveness in California is uncertain, but a survey of ornithologists highlighted them as likely bird-dispersed. I quantified bird frugivory of these plants, compared them with a native species (Heteromeles arbutifolia), and explored the management implications of dispersal mutualisms for these and other incipient invasive plants. Fruit removal by birds was sufficient to permit spread for all study species. Seed dispersers (rather than seed predators) and pulse feeders (flocking species with potential for long distance dispersal) performed most fruit removal for the non-native species, a pattern indicative of an effective dispersal regime. The number of fruiting trees per stand was a significant predictor of bird visitation. Founding population size may thus be important in management of invasive, bird-dispersed plants. Disperser-defined niches were relatively narrow because a few disperser species performed the majority of fruit removal from study trees, but each fruit species was consumed by a variety of potential dispersers. This results in strong pairwise niche overlap between some plant species. Ordinated by bird use, study site-species combinations clustered more by geographic location than by plant species, emphasizing the opportunistic nature of bird foraging. None of the non-native focal plant species appears dispersal limited, and all have formed novel mutualisms in California. It is possible that these plants are now in lag phases preceding bird-mediated invasion. Consideration of bird dispersal when evaluating invasiveness is therefore an imperative.
AB - I examined the role of bird dispersal in invasiveness of three non-native plant species in California, USA: Triadica sebifera, Ligustrum lucidum, and Olea europaea. I selected these species because their invasiveness in California is uncertain, but a survey of ornithologists highlighted them as likely bird-dispersed. I quantified bird frugivory of these plants, compared them with a native species (Heteromeles arbutifolia), and explored the management implications of dispersal mutualisms for these and other incipient invasive plants. Fruit removal by birds was sufficient to permit spread for all study species. Seed dispersers (rather than seed predators) and pulse feeders (flocking species with potential for long distance dispersal) performed most fruit removal for the non-native species, a pattern indicative of an effective dispersal regime. The number of fruiting trees per stand was a significant predictor of bird visitation. Founding population size may thus be important in management of invasive, bird-dispersed plants. Disperser-defined niches were relatively narrow because a few disperser species performed the majority of fruit removal from study trees, but each fruit species was consumed by a variety of potential dispersers. This results in strong pairwise niche overlap between some plant species. Ordinated by bird use, study site-species combinations clustered more by geographic location than by plant species, emphasizing the opportunistic nature of bird foraging. None of the non-native focal plant species appears dispersal limited, and all have formed novel mutualisms in California. It is possible that these plants are now in lag phases preceding bird-mediated invasion. Consideration of bird dispersal when evaluating invasiveness is therefore an imperative.
KW - Bird-mediated dispersal
KW - Focal individual observations
KW - Frugivory
KW - Mutualisms
KW - Niche
KW - Risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80255138633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80255138633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10530-011-9966-1
DO - 10.1007/s10530-011-9966-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80255138633
SN - 1387-3547
VL - 13
SP - 2829
EP - 2845
JO - Biological Invasions
JF - Biological Invasions
IS - 12
ER -