How and When Democratic Values Matter: Challenging the Effectiveness-Centric Framework in Program Evaluation

Yixin Liu, Heewon Lee, Frances Berry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Performance information is overwhelmingly used in program evaluation by both public managers and external stakeholders. In the market-based New Public Management movement, effectiveness is public programs’ major selling point. However, this approach may marginalize the role of democratic values in governance. In the current complex society with anti-government sentiments, we embrace the idea of New Public Service to reiterate the importance of democratic values. Using a conjoint experiment, we compare the effects of effectiveness and democratic values in predicting public program evaluation, conditioned on citizens’ trust in government. Our results show that effectiveness and democratic values contribute similar effects in explaining policy preferences. Distrust in government strengthens the effect of democratic values but reduces the effect of effectiveness. Our findings challenge the prevalent effectiveness-centric framework in public management. We suggest that citizen-state interaction should not rely only on performance merits, but also on inclusiveness and openness values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)820-845
Number of pages26
JournalPublic Performance and Management Review
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • conjoint experiment
  • democratic values
  • new public service
  • performance management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How and When Democratic Values Matter: Challenging the Effectiveness-Centric Framework in Program Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this