How advanced is the strategy paradigm? The role of particularism and universalism in shaping research outcomes

Brian K. Boyd, Sydney Finkelstein, Steve Gove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

As the field of strategy reaches its 25th anniversary, we examine how far the field has progressed during that time. Both management and strategy research have been characterized as being in an early stage of development. We draw on Kuhn's (1996) paradigm development model, which posits a connection between a field's stage of maturity and research processes and outcomes, to assess the maturity of the strategy field. We conduct two studies. The first is a cross-discipline comparison of productivity norms for university faculty. The second study examines longitudinal research outcomes for a sample of 945 strategy faculty. Our results indicate that strategy has the attributes of both an early stage and mature field: while overall research norms are low relative to other fields, they are driven far more by merit-based than non-merit factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)841-854
Number of pages14
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Paradigm development
  • Research productivity
  • Strategy research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How advanced is the strategy paradigm? The role of particularism and universalism in shaping research outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this