TY - JOUR
T1 - Forest management, forest vegetation, and climate influence nesting ecology of a focal bird species in the western USA
AU - Miller-ter Kuile, Ana
AU - Ogle, Kiona
AU - Cavanaugh, Cheran
AU - Dudley, Jonathan
AU - Markus, Amy
AU - Saab, Victoria
AU - Wright, Marilyn
AU - Sanderlin, Jamie
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge that the work for this project took place in the traditional territories of the following First Peoples: Klamath and Modoc (Fremont-Winema National Forest); Yahooskin Numu (Northern Paiute) (Fremont-Winema National Forest and Malheur National Forest); the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs (Malheur National Forest); the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation (Cayuse -Walla Walla - Umatilla) (Malheur National Forest and Payette National Forest); and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Nimiipuu (Nez Perce), Shoshone-Bannock, and Lemhi-Shoshone (Payette National Forest). Northern Arizona University (NAU) is in the homelands of Hopitutskwa, Ndee/Nnēē (Western Apache), Hohokam, and multiple Pueblos. For more information about these Peoples, please visit native-land.ca, which provides a map of traditional territories and links to individual websites. Funding for this project came from the Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service and the National Forest System (NFS). Computational analyses were run on Northern Arizona University’s Monsoon computing cluster, funded by Arizona’s Technology and Research Initiative Fund. Field work was conducted by multiple field crews, and we would especially like to thank Jaan Kolts and Dylan Hopkins for their crew-leader oversight, our crew leaders Timothy Abeles, Kristen Bayley, Matthew Boone, Nathan Dryer, Adam Kehoe, Kathryn Knox, Roy Morris, Stephanie Muise, Krista Reicis, Molly Runyon, and Jorge Sedeno for their leadership, dedication, and enthusiasm to their respective CFLRPs. We appreciate the logistical support for each CFLRP and feedback on management contextualization from forest and district biologists, silviculturists, and resource specialists including Larry Amell, Jon Almack, Gunnar Carnwath, Ana Egnew, June Galloway, Dustin Hollowell, Sabine Mellmann-Brown, Clark Reames, Joe Rausch, Lori Stokes, and Amy Unthank. We value the input of the editors and an anonymous reviewer in improving this manuscript.
Funding Information:
We acknowledge that the work for this project took place in the traditional territories of the following First Peoples: Klamath and Modoc (Fremont-Winema National Forest); Yahooskin Numu (Northern Paiute) (Fremont-Winema National Forest and Malheur National Forest); the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs (Malheur National Forest); the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation (Cayuse -Walla Walla - Umatilla) (Malheur National Forest and Payette National Forest); and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Nimiipuu (Nez Perce), Shoshone-Bannock, and Lemhi-Shoshone (Payette National Forest). Northern Arizona University (NAU) is in the homelands of Hopitutskwa, Ndee/Nnēē (Western Apache), Hohokam, and multiple Pueblos. For more information about these Peoples, please visit native-land.ca, which provides a map of traditional territories and links to individual websites. Funding for this project came from the Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service and the National Forest System (NFS). Computational analyses were run on Northern Arizona University's Monsoon computing cluster, funded by Arizona's Technology and Research Initiative Fund. Field work was conducted by multiple field crews, and we would especially like to thank Jaan Kolts and Dylan Hopkins for their crew-leader oversight, our crew leaders Timothy Abeles, Kristen Bayley, Matthew Boone, Nathan Dryer, Adam Kehoe, Kathryn Knox, Roy Morris, Stephanie Muise, Krista Reicis, Molly Runyon, and Jorge Sedeno for their leadership, dedication, and enthusiasm to their respective CFLRPs. We appreciate the logistical support for each CFLRP and feedback on management contextualization from forest and district biologists, silviculturists, and resource specialists including Larry Amell, Jon Almack, Gunnar Carnwath, Ana Egnew, June Galloway, Dustin Hollowell, Sabine Mellmann-Brown, Clark Reames, Joe Rausch, Lori Stokes, and Amy Unthank. We value the input of the editors and an anonymous reviewer in improving this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - Landscape-scale forest restoration aims to restore ecological structure and function and provide habitat for wildlife. However, forest management likely has varying impacts across wildlife life stages, with consequences for population persistence. Using 10 years of nest (n = 294) survey data for a focal bird species, white-headed woodpecker (Dryobates albolarvatus), we assessed how forest management (tree removal and prescribed burning) at two spatial scales (stand [2.25 ha] and landscape [314 ha]), forest vegetation variables at three spatial scales (nest tree, local [0.4 ha], and landscape [314 ha]), and climate influenced nest initiation date, egg production, egg survival, and nestling survival. We applied Bayesian hierarchical mixed effects models to these data to identify and compare drivers at each life stage. None of the variables we considered influenced egg production; white-headed woodpeckers laid an average of four eggs. As the extent of the landscape with tree removal increased, nests initiated later. Egg survival was higher in nests with prescribed burning at the stand scale. Nestling survival was higher in sites that had been managed with burning and tree removal at the stand scale, but the relationship with burning switched to negative at the landscape scale. Only nestling survival was shaped by attributes of the nest cavity itself. Egg survival increased with increased variation in forest patch sizes at the landscape scale. Woodpeckers initiated nests earlier under warmer conditions, with previous August and September temperatures being particularly influential. Both egg and nestling survival increased with cumulative precipitation. While increased temperatures decreased egg survival, nestling survival peaked at an optimal maximum temperature (∼32 °C). This study illustrates how forest management, forest vegetation, and climate factors affecting nesting ecology vary throughout the nesting season. Additionally, effects that switch directions (positive versus negative) across spatial scales indicate spatially dependent ecological processes (e.g., nest suitability versus adult foraging). This study provides a model for assessing the effects of forest management on bird population persistence by considering the nesting season as stages with distinct ecological limitations linked to spatially-dependent factors.
AB - Landscape-scale forest restoration aims to restore ecological structure and function and provide habitat for wildlife. However, forest management likely has varying impacts across wildlife life stages, with consequences for population persistence. Using 10 years of nest (n = 294) survey data for a focal bird species, white-headed woodpecker (Dryobates albolarvatus), we assessed how forest management (tree removal and prescribed burning) at two spatial scales (stand [2.25 ha] and landscape [314 ha]), forest vegetation variables at three spatial scales (nest tree, local [0.4 ha], and landscape [314 ha]), and climate influenced nest initiation date, egg production, egg survival, and nestling survival. We applied Bayesian hierarchical mixed effects models to these data to identify and compare drivers at each life stage. None of the variables we considered influenced egg production; white-headed woodpeckers laid an average of four eggs. As the extent of the landscape with tree removal increased, nests initiated later. Egg survival was higher in nests with prescribed burning at the stand scale. Nestling survival was higher in sites that had been managed with burning and tree removal at the stand scale, but the relationship with burning switched to negative at the landscape scale. Only nestling survival was shaped by attributes of the nest cavity itself. Egg survival increased with increased variation in forest patch sizes at the landscape scale. Woodpeckers initiated nests earlier under warmer conditions, with previous August and September temperatures being particularly influential. Both egg and nestling survival increased with cumulative precipitation. While increased temperatures decreased egg survival, nestling survival peaked at an optimal maximum temperature (∼32 °C). This study illustrates how forest management, forest vegetation, and climate factors affecting nesting ecology vary throughout the nesting season. Additionally, effects that switch directions (positive versus negative) across spatial scales indicate spatially dependent ecological processes (e.g., nest suitability versus adult foraging). This study provides a model for assessing the effects of forest management on bird population persistence by considering the nesting season as stages with distinct ecological limitations linked to spatially-dependent factors.
KW - Egg production
KW - Egg survival
KW - Landscape-scale forest restoration
KW - Nest initiation
KW - Nestling survival
KW - White-headed woodpecker
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172681115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85172681115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121443
DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121443
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85172681115
SN - 0378-1127
VL - 549
JO - Forest Ecology and Management
JF - Forest Ecology and Management
M1 - 121443
ER -