TY - JOUR
T1 - Five-year post-restoration conditions and simulated climate-change trajectories in a warm/dry mixed-conifer forest, southwestern Colorado, USA
AU - Stoddard, M. T.
AU - Sánchez Meador, A. J.
AU - Fulé, Peter Z.
AU - Korb, Julie E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2015/11/15
Y1 - 2015/11/15
N2 - Some warm/dry mixed-conifer forests are at increasing risk of uncharacteristically large, high-severity fires. As a result, managers have begun ecological restoration efforts using treatments such as mechanical thinning and prescribed fire. Empirical information on the long-term impacts of these treatments is limited, especially in light of potential climate change. We assessed changes in forest structure and composition five-years following three alternative restoration treatments in a warm/dry mixed-conifer forest: (1) thin/burn, (2) prescribe burn, and (3) control. We used the Climate-Forest Vegetation Simulator (Climate-FVS) model to quantify potential forest trajectories under alternative climate scenarios. Five years following treatments, changes in forest structure were similar to initial post-treatment conditions, with thin/burn being the only treatment to shift and maintain forest structure and composition within historical reference conditions. By 2013, the thin/burn had reduced basal area (11.3m2ha-1) and tree density (117.2treeha-1) by 56% and 79% respectively, compared to pre-treatment values. In the burn, basal area (20.5m2ha-1) and tree density (316.6treeha-1) was reduced by 20% and 35% respectively, from 2002 to 2013. Mortality of large ponderosa pine trees (the most fire-resistant species) throughout the duration of the experiment, averaged 6% in the burn compared to 16% in the thin/burn treatment. Changes five years following treatments were largely due to increases in sprouting species. Shrub and sapling densities were approximately two to three times higher (respectively) in the thin/burn compared to burn and control and dominated by sprouting oak and aspen. Under climate simulations, the thin/burn was more resilient in maintaining forest conditions compared to burn and control which approached meager forest conditions (3-4m2ha-1). These results indicate that restoration treatment that include both thinning and burning can maintain forest integrity over the next few decades.
AB - Some warm/dry mixed-conifer forests are at increasing risk of uncharacteristically large, high-severity fires. As a result, managers have begun ecological restoration efforts using treatments such as mechanical thinning and prescribed fire. Empirical information on the long-term impacts of these treatments is limited, especially in light of potential climate change. We assessed changes in forest structure and composition five-years following three alternative restoration treatments in a warm/dry mixed-conifer forest: (1) thin/burn, (2) prescribe burn, and (3) control. We used the Climate-Forest Vegetation Simulator (Climate-FVS) model to quantify potential forest trajectories under alternative climate scenarios. Five years following treatments, changes in forest structure were similar to initial post-treatment conditions, with thin/burn being the only treatment to shift and maintain forest structure and composition within historical reference conditions. By 2013, the thin/burn had reduced basal area (11.3m2ha-1) and tree density (117.2treeha-1) by 56% and 79% respectively, compared to pre-treatment values. In the burn, basal area (20.5m2ha-1) and tree density (316.6treeha-1) was reduced by 20% and 35% respectively, from 2002 to 2013. Mortality of large ponderosa pine trees (the most fire-resistant species) throughout the duration of the experiment, averaged 6% in the burn compared to 16% in the thin/burn treatment. Changes five years following treatments were largely due to increases in sprouting species. Shrub and sapling densities were approximately two to three times higher (respectively) in the thin/burn compared to burn and control and dominated by sprouting oak and aspen. Under climate simulations, the thin/burn was more resilient in maintaining forest conditions compared to burn and control which approached meager forest conditions (3-4m2ha-1). These results indicate that restoration treatment that include both thinning and burning can maintain forest integrity over the next few decades.
KW - Climate-Forest Vegetation Simulator
KW - Ecological restoration
KW - Historical reference conditions
KW - Prescribed fire
KW - Thinning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945438595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945438595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.007
DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84945438595
SN - 0378-1127
VL - 356
SP - 253
EP - 261
JO - Forest Ecology and Management
JF - Forest Ecology and Management
ER -