TY - JOUR
T1 - Explaining inter-annual variability of gross primary productivity from plant phenology and physiology
AU - Zhou, Sha
AU - Zhang, Yao
AU - Caylor, Kelly K.
AU - Luo, Yiqi
AU - Xiao, Xiangming
AU - Ciais, Philippe
AU - Huang, Yuefei
AU - Wang, Guangqian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/10/15
Y1 - 2016/10/15
N2 - Climate variability influences both plant phenology and physiology, resulting in inter-annual variation in terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). However, it is still difficult to explain the inter-annual variability of GPP. In this study, we propose a Statistical Model of Integrated Phenology and Physiology (SMIPP) to explain the contributions of maximum daily GPP (GPPmax), and start and end of the growing season (GSstart and GSend) to the inter-annual variability of GPP observed at 27 sites across North America and Europe. Strong relationships are found between the anomalies of GSstart and spring GPP (r = 0.82 ± 0.10), GPPmax and summer GPP (r = 0.90 ± 0.14), and GSend and autumn GPP (r = 0.75 ± 0.18) within each site. Partial correlation analysis further supports strong correlations of annual GPP with GSstart (partial r value being 0.72 ± 0.20), GPPmax (0.87 ± 0.15), and GSend (0.59 ± 0.26), respectively. In addition, the three indicators are found independent from each other to influence annual GPP at most of the 27 sites. Overall, the site-calibrated SMIPP explains 90 ± 11% of the annual GPP variability among the 27 sites. In general, GPPmax contributes to annual GPP variation more than the two phenological indicators. These results indicate that the inter-annual variability of GPP can be effectively estimated using the three indicators. Investigating plant physiology, and spring and autumn phenology to environmental changes can improve the prediction of the annual GPP trajectory under future climate change.
AB - Climate variability influences both plant phenology and physiology, resulting in inter-annual variation in terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). However, it is still difficult to explain the inter-annual variability of GPP. In this study, we propose a Statistical Model of Integrated Phenology and Physiology (SMIPP) to explain the contributions of maximum daily GPP (GPPmax), and start and end of the growing season (GSstart and GSend) to the inter-annual variability of GPP observed at 27 sites across North America and Europe. Strong relationships are found between the anomalies of GSstart and spring GPP (r = 0.82 ± 0.10), GPPmax and summer GPP (r = 0.90 ± 0.14), and GSend and autumn GPP (r = 0.75 ± 0.18) within each site. Partial correlation analysis further supports strong correlations of annual GPP with GSstart (partial r value being 0.72 ± 0.20), GPPmax (0.87 ± 0.15), and GSend (0.59 ± 0.26), respectively. In addition, the three indicators are found independent from each other to influence annual GPP at most of the 27 sites. Overall, the site-calibrated SMIPP explains 90 ± 11% of the annual GPP variability among the 27 sites. In general, GPPmax contributes to annual GPP variation more than the two phenological indicators. These results indicate that the inter-annual variability of GPP can be effectively estimated using the three indicators. Investigating plant physiology, and spring and autumn phenology to environmental changes can improve the prediction of the annual GPP trajectory under future climate change.
KW - Climate change
KW - Daily maximum GPP
KW - Drought
KW - End of growing season
KW - Start of growing season
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976324531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976324531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.06.010
DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.06.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84976324531
SN - 0168-1923
VL - 226-227
SP - 246
EP - 256
JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
ER -