TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing evidence for resilience
T2 - a case of monsoon flood-affected communities in the Gangetic Plains of South Asia
AU - Saxena, Alark
AU - Huneeus, Camilo Jesus
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Lutheran World Relief (LWR) Ms. Nicole Hark- Senior Regional Director for Asia and the Middle East and Mr. Garett Schiche- Director of Program Quality for their support and insightful discussion. We would like to particularly thank Narayan Gyawali- Program Director for his support in data collection. Special thanks to Prof. Timothy Gregoire and Prof. Jonathan Reunning-Shere at Yale School of Environment (formerly known as Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies) for their valuable feedback on our methodology. We would like to acknowledge the support of Kristen Dreiling, Kristin Lambert, Benjamin Cohen, and Zach Garcia in initial research phase of the project. We also appreciate Claudia Grossi and Ana Lambert for proofreading, and Dr. Alder Keleman Saxena for giving constructive feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - The concept of resilience has been rapidly accepted across multiple disciplines and spheres of applied work, but operationalizing resilience poses several methodological challenges. Issues associated with complexity due to system dynamics, nonlinearity, and self-organization render traditional evaluation methods insufficient and often speculative. Focusing on system actors, processes and structures, and the scales of the system involved, we provide a framework and methodology to establish evidence and evaluate resilience. We take the case of two transboundary communities situated in the Gangetic plains of South Asia, i.e., Paklihawa (Nepal) and Shivpur (India), that are affected by annual monsoonal floods. Using an accessibility-based livelihood framework, we identified key indicators contributing to resilience and measured them in select households, pre- and post-monsoon, over three consecutive years. Focusing on the variation in well-being and coping capacity, we recommend two propositions that must simultaneously be satisfied for increased resilience. Over time, first, the well-being of the communities should increase, and second, the magnitude of recovery from shocks by the communities should decrease, approaching zero. We used a repeated measures analysis of variance to evaluate the significance of changes in well-being and recoveries over time. Our analysis shows that the resilience of Paklihawa increased significantly while Shivpur’s remained inconclusive. The two propositions and the methodology are robust to a wide range of shocks and social-ecological systems. This study contributes to the growing need for approaches toward measuring resilience and the monitoring and evaluation of resilience-focused interventions.
AB - The concept of resilience has been rapidly accepted across multiple disciplines and spheres of applied work, but operationalizing resilience poses several methodological challenges. Issues associated with complexity due to system dynamics, nonlinearity, and self-organization render traditional evaluation methods insufficient and often speculative. Focusing on system actors, processes and structures, and the scales of the system involved, we provide a framework and methodology to establish evidence and evaluate resilience. We take the case of two transboundary communities situated in the Gangetic plains of South Asia, i.e., Paklihawa (Nepal) and Shivpur (India), that are affected by annual monsoonal floods. Using an accessibility-based livelihood framework, we identified key indicators contributing to resilience and measured them in select households, pre- and post-monsoon, over three consecutive years. Focusing on the variation in well-being and coping capacity, we recommend two propositions that must simultaneously be satisfied for increased resilience. Over time, first, the well-being of the communities should increase, and second, the magnitude of recovery from shocks by the communities should decrease, approaching zero. We used a repeated measures analysis of variance to evaluate the significance of changes in well-being and recoveries over time. Our analysis shows that the resilience of Paklihawa increased significantly while Shivpur’s remained inconclusive. The two propositions and the methodology are robust to a wide range of shocks and social-ecological systems. This study contributes to the growing need for approaches toward measuring resilience and the monitoring and evaluation of resilience-focused interventions.
KW - Complex adaptive systems
KW - Coping capacity
KW - Livelihood framework
KW - Monitoring and evaluation
KW - Monsoon flood
KW - Resilience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132997009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132997009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11027-022-10009-6
DO - 10.1007/s11027-022-10009-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85132997009
SN - 1381-2386
VL - 27
JO - Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
JF - Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
IS - 5
M1 - 35
ER -