Abstract
Background: There is much interest in how the Amazon rainforest may respond to future rainfall reduction. However, there are relatively few ecosystem-scale studies to inform this debate. Aims: We described the carbon cycle in a 1 ha rainforest plot subjected to 8-10 consecutive years of ca. 50% through-fall reduction (TFR) and compare these results with those from a nearby, unmodified control plot in eastern Amazonia. Methods: We quantified the components of net primary productivity (NPP), autotrophic (R a) and heterotrophic respiration, and estimate gross primary productivity (GPP, the sum of NPP and R a) and carbon-use efficiency (CUE, the ratio of NPP/GPP). Results: The TFR forest exhibited slightly lower NPP but slightly higher R a, such that forest CUE was 0.29 ± 0.04 on the control plot but 0.25 ± 0.03 on the TFR plot. Compared with four years earlier, TFR plot leaf area index and small tree growth recovered and soil heterotrophic respiration had risen. Conclusions: This analysis tested and extended the key findings of a similar analysis 4 years earlier in the TFR treatment. The results indicated that, while the forest recovered from extended drought in some respects, it maintained higher overall R a relative to the undroughted control, potentially causing the droughted forest to act as a net source of CO2.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 7-24 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Plant Ecology and Diversity |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- CUE
- Caxiuanã National Forest Reserve
- GPP
- NPP
- PCE
- biomass allocation
- carbon cycling
- climate change
- drought
- tropical rainforest
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Ecology
- Plant Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ecosystem respiration and net primary productivity after 8-10 years of experimental through-fall reduction in an eastern Amazon forest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS