TY - JOUR
T1 - Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching?
AU - Nishikawa, Kiisa C.
AU - Murray, Sara T.
AU - Flanders, Martha
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - For reaching movements in one plane, the hand has been observed to follow a similar path regardless of speed. Recent work on the control of more complex reaching movements raises the question of whether a similar 'speed invariance' also holds for the additional degrees of freedom. Therefore we examined human arm movements involving initial and final hand locations distributed throughout the three-dimensional (3D) workspace of the arm. Despite this added complexity, arm kinematics (summarized by the spatial orientation of the 'plane of the arm' and the 3D curvature of the hand path) changed very little for movements performed over a wide range of speeds. If the total force (dynamic + quasistatic) had been optimized by the control system (e.g., as in a minimization of the change in joint torques or the change in muscular forces), the optimal solution would change with speed; slow movements would reflect the minimal antigravity torques, whereas fast movements would be more strongly influenced by dynamic factors. The speed- invariant postures observed in this study are instead consistent with a hypothesized optimization of only the dynamic forces.
AB - For reaching movements in one plane, the hand has been observed to follow a similar path regardless of speed. Recent work on the control of more complex reaching movements raises the question of whether a similar 'speed invariance' also holds for the additional degrees of freedom. Therefore we examined human arm movements involving initial and final hand locations distributed throughout the three-dimensional (3D) workspace of the arm. Despite this added complexity, arm kinematics (summarized by the spatial orientation of the 'plane of the arm' and the 3D curvature of the hand path) changed very little for movements performed over a wide range of speeds. If the total force (dynamic + quasistatic) had been optimized by the control system (e.g., as in a minimization of the change in joint torques or the change in muscular forces), the optimal solution would change with speed; slow movements would reflect the minimal antigravity torques, whereas fast movements would be more strongly influenced by dynamic factors. The speed- invariant postures observed in this study are instead consistent with a hypothesized optimization of only the dynamic forces.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033054297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033054297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2582
DO - 10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2582
M3 - Article
C2 - 10322091
AN - SCOPUS:0033054297
SN - 0022-3077
VL - 81
SP - 2582
EP - 2586
JO - Journal of Neurophysiology
JF - Journal of Neurophysiology
IS - 5
ER -