TY - JOUR
T1 - Distributed Wind Resource Assessment for Small, Kilowatt-Sized Wind Turbines using Computational Flow Modeling Software
AU - Acker, T. L.
AU - Bhattarai, B.
AU - Shrestha, R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3/3
Y1 - 2020/3/3
N2 - A major challenge in deciding to invest in a wind energy system as part of an off-grid, small-scale renewable energy system is accurately estimating the annual energy production (AEP). Computational models hold promise to provide useful distributed wind resource assessment information at a reasonable cost. This paper describes the methods employed and results obtained from using wind flow modeling software, in this case Meteodyn WT, combined with wind speed data to predict the AEP of a 2.4 kW Skystream 3.7 wind turbine, and compare the AEP to measurements. Results showed AEP prediction errors ranging from <5% to ∼80% depending on the nature of the wind speed data used. Using a single wind speed data source could lead to an acceptable AEP (<10% error), but could well lead to much higher errors. Two methods of addressing this problem were demonstrated: 1) average several AEP predictions made using single wind speed data sources; or, 2) use multiple data sources simultaneously when making an AEP prediction. The latter of these two appears the most promising with lower errors in AEP. Another significant result of this work was demonstrating that using NREL Wind Toolkit wind speed data can produce good results in predicting AEP.
AB - A major challenge in deciding to invest in a wind energy system as part of an off-grid, small-scale renewable energy system is accurately estimating the annual energy production (AEP). Computational models hold promise to provide useful distributed wind resource assessment information at a reasonable cost. This paper describes the methods employed and results obtained from using wind flow modeling software, in this case Meteodyn WT, combined with wind speed data to predict the AEP of a 2.4 kW Skystream 3.7 wind turbine, and compare the AEP to measurements. Results showed AEP prediction errors ranging from <5% to ∼80% depending on the nature of the wind speed data used. Using a single wind speed data source could lead to an acceptable AEP (<10% error), but could well lead to much higher errors. Two methods of addressing this problem were demonstrated: 1) average several AEP predictions made using single wind speed data sources; or, 2) use multiple data sources simultaneously when making an AEP prediction. The latter of these two appears the most promising with lower errors in AEP. Another significant result of this work was demonstrating that using NREL Wind Toolkit wind speed data can produce good results in predicting AEP.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081615009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081615009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012013
DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012013
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85081615009
SN - 1742-6588
VL - 1452
JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series
JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series
IS - 1
M1 - 012013
T2 - North American Wind Energy Academy, NAWEA 2019 and the International Conference on Future Technologies in Wind Energy 2019, WindTech 2019
Y2 - 14 October 2019 through 16 October 2019
ER -