TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential responses of soil CO2 and N2O fluxes to experimental warming
AU - Zou, Junliang
AU - Tobin, Brian
AU - Luo, Yiqi
AU - Osborne, Bruce
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers and the section editor for their valuable comments and suggestions. We thank all the people who offered help both in the field and laboratory. We also would like to express our gratitude to Darragh Headon, who gave permission to use the grassland in this study. This research was financially supported by the joint Ph.D. programme grant ( 201206300050 ) from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) and University College Dublin (UCD) . Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/9/15
Y1 - 2018/9/15
N2 - Land-use conversions and elevated temperature can impact on carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, both of which are important greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Afforestation activity has increased significantly over the last century with a significant focus in recent years directed at offsetting GHG emissions, as forests have a large capacity to store carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) as well as affecting CO2 and N2O emissions. However, the impact of warming on GHG offsetting is unclear. This study was conducted in a forest and a grassland to investigate the effect of afforestation and warming, using infrared heaters, on soil fluxes of CO2 and N2O. Warming significantly increased the daily mean soil temperatures at a depth of 5 cm by 1.7 °C and reduced the soil moisture by ∼5% in the forest from March 2014 to February 2016. In the grassland, there were no significant increases in temperature and moisture with warming and no impact on the soil fluxes of CO2 and N2O. In the forest, elevated soil temperature enhanced the average soil CO2 efflux by 23% but had no effect on soil N2O fluxes. Warming decreased the temperature sensitivity by 13% and 23% at the forest and grassland, respectively. The soil fluxes of CO2 increased exponentially with temperature and decreased linearly with the reduction in soil moisture, and were much larger in the grassland compared to the forest. However the grassland proved to be a larger sink for N2O than the forest. Irrespective of warming treatments, all measured pools were significantly larger in the grassland compared to the forest. Our results imply that afforestation may have a bigger effect than warming on soil CO2 and N2O fluxes within the range of temperatures used and that afforestation dramatically lowers the inorganic, organic and microbial C and N pools, that could, in turn, impact on the responses of forest soils to future global warming.
AB - Land-use conversions and elevated temperature can impact on carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, both of which are important greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Afforestation activity has increased significantly over the last century with a significant focus in recent years directed at offsetting GHG emissions, as forests have a large capacity to store carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) as well as affecting CO2 and N2O emissions. However, the impact of warming on GHG offsetting is unclear. This study was conducted in a forest and a grassland to investigate the effect of afforestation and warming, using infrared heaters, on soil fluxes of CO2 and N2O. Warming significantly increased the daily mean soil temperatures at a depth of 5 cm by 1.7 °C and reduced the soil moisture by ∼5% in the forest from March 2014 to February 2016. In the grassland, there were no significant increases in temperature and moisture with warming and no impact on the soil fluxes of CO2 and N2O. In the forest, elevated soil temperature enhanced the average soil CO2 efflux by 23% but had no effect on soil N2O fluxes. Warming decreased the temperature sensitivity by 13% and 23% at the forest and grassland, respectively. The soil fluxes of CO2 increased exponentially with temperature and decreased linearly with the reduction in soil moisture, and were much larger in the grassland compared to the forest. However the grassland proved to be a larger sink for N2O than the forest. Irrespective of warming treatments, all measured pools were significantly larger in the grassland compared to the forest. Our results imply that afforestation may have a bigger effect than warming on soil CO2 and N2O fluxes within the range of temperatures used and that afforestation dramatically lowers the inorganic, organic and microbial C and N pools, that could, in turn, impact on the responses of forest soils to future global warming.
KW - Experimental warming
KW - Infrared heater
KW - Land-use
KW - Sitka spruce
KW - Soil respiration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046077406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046077406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.04.006
DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.04.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046077406
SN - 0168-1923
VL - 259
SP - 11
EP - 22
JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
ER -