Democracy promotion and electoral quality: A disaggregated analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The international community spends significant sums of money on democracy promotion, focusing especially on producing competitive and transparent electoral environments. In theory, aid empowers a variety of actors, increasing competition and government responsiveness. We argue that to fully understand the effect of aid on democratization one must consider how democracy aid affects specific country institutions. Building on theory from the democratization and democracy promotion literature, we specify more precise causal linkages between democracy assistance and elections. Specifically, we hypothesize about the effects of democracy aid on the implementation and quality of elections. Building on canonical work, we test these hypotheses, using V-Dem's detailed elections measures to examine the impact of democracy aid. Intriguingly, we find that there is no consistent relationship between democracy and governance aid and the improvement of disaggregated indicators of election quality, but aggregate measures still capture a relationship. We suggest that current evidence is more consistent with election-enhancing aid following democratization than with democratization following such aid.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-521
Number of pages17
JournalGovernance
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Democracy promotion and electoral quality: A disaggregated analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this